Skip to content

PDHG docs shy about function requirements #2219

@manchester-jhellier

Description

@manchester-jhellier

Description

While using PDHG for the first time in a while, kept having problems getting it to run until I examined PDHG's docs very thoroughly. Would be nice if they were very upfront about the requirements on f in particular.

I've already made a revision to the docs, will PR and cite this issue.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions