Skip to content

RFD 190 Deprecating NodeJS for Rust#166

Open
nshalman wants to merge 6 commits into
masterfrom
rfd-190
Open

RFD 190 Deprecating NodeJS for Rust#166
nshalman wants to merge 6 commits into
masterfrom
rfd-190

Conversation

@nshalman
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

nshalman and others added 6 commits December 10, 2025 11:29
Create a basic outline
- Remove empty "Definitions of Terms" section
- Format priorities as proper markdown list
- Clarify "APIs that break" to "APIs that are currently broken"
- Add links to Dropshot and Progenitor GitHub repos
- Format technical guidance as bullet list with arrows
- Fix typo: "suddently" → "suddenly"

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Add inline TODO comments requesting clarification on:
- NodeJS vs Rust values alignment
- Interoperability during migration
- Dropshot terminology
- LLM section structure
- Bugview description and migration links

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Comment thread rfd/0190/README.md
We have lots of software that only runs against a very very old version of NodeJS.
This presents maintenance and security problems.

The NodeJS project's values are a mismatch with our own.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not even sure if that's 100% true anymore, but it was certainly true back when folks started freezing against various much-older versions of software. There are probably some commits to inspect as well about what a PITA it is to update things to more-modern versions, even if they are still quite old (looks at 6.17.1).

Ideally a history lesson should go here, but nobody, save MAYBE one, active on this project has quite enough context to provide said lesson.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants