Hi, thanks for the great work and releasing the code to reproduce it.
I have a few questions regarding the kronecker adaptation forward pass through the adapter modules:
(1) The scaling factor you use for the KAdaptation is 1/5 times the scaling used in standard LoRA:
https://github.com/eric-ai-lab/PEViT/blob/be6fb43ff54adeeffe720c663dd238976070558e/vision_benchmark/evaluation/model.py#L564
Is there a justification for this or is it simply an empirical magic number?
(2) While forwarding through your adapter for the value matrix, it seems like you reuse the query weight matrix (A as defined in the paper as I understand it). Is this a typo/bug?
https://github.com/eric-ai-lab/PEViT/blob/be6fb43ff54adeeffe720c663dd238976070558e/vision_benchmark/evaluation/model.py#L571-L580
Shouldn't line 580 be H = kronecker_product_einsum_batched(phm_rule2, Wv).sum(0) instead?
Hi, thanks for the great work and releasing the code to reproduce it.
I have a few questions regarding the kronecker adaptation forward pass through the adapter modules:
(1) The scaling factor you use for the KAdaptation is 1/5 times the scaling used in standard LoRA:
https://github.com/eric-ai-lab/PEViT/blob/be6fb43ff54adeeffe720c663dd238976070558e/vision_benchmark/evaluation/model.py#L564
Is there a justification for this or is it simply an empirical magic number?
(2) While forwarding through your adapter for the value matrix, it seems like you reuse the query weight matrix (A as defined in the paper as I understand it). Is this a typo/bug?
https://github.com/eric-ai-lab/PEViT/blob/be6fb43ff54adeeffe720c663dd238976070558e/vision_benchmark/evaluation/model.py#L571-L580
Shouldn't line 580 be
H = kronecker_product_einsum_batched(phm_rule2, Wv).sum(0)instead?