I raised a question with the service support group as some of the responses to this API were becoming slow/incomplete and unpredictable. I was told that I ought to be using v2 of the API and directed to a UI url.
Should this language binding be moving to the v2 'API'?
[nb, in the original terminology of technical architectures, an API is bound to a specific programming language. An interface that's a url is really a protocol, not an API]
I raised a question with the service support group as some of the responses to this API were becoming slow/incomplete and unpredictable. I was told that I ought to be using v2 of the API and directed to a UI url.
Should this language binding be moving to the v2 'API'?
[nb, in the original terminology of technical architectures, an API is bound to a specific programming language. An interface that's a url is really a protocol, not an API]