Reality: Basic crypto functions implemented Missing for real compliance:
- FIPS 140-2 certification requires hardware security modules or certified software
- Our implementation uses standard Go crypto (not FIPS-validated)
- No entropy testing or key lifecycle management
- No cryptographic officer roles
- Implemented: ~8 controls (6% actual coverage)
- Missing: 122 controls including:
- Asset management
- Configuration management
- System and information integrity
- Media protection
- Physical protection
- Recovery procedures
- Risk assessment
SOC 2 Type II Requirements:
- Security
- Availability
- Processing integrity
- Confidentiality
- Privacy
What we'd need:
- Formal security policies and procedures
- Risk assessment methodology
- Vendor management program
- Business continuity planning
- Change management process
- Monthly/quarterly reviews with auditors
- Cost: $25k-75k for initial audit
Missing GDPR Requirements:
- Data protection impact assessments
- Privacy by design implementation
- Right to erasure (right to be forgotten)
- Data portability mechanisms
- Consent management systems
- Data breach notification procedures (72-hour rule)
- Data processing records
- Data Protection Officer appointment
Missing Requirements:
- Information Security Management System (ISMS)
- Risk treatment plans
- Security awareness training program
- Supplier relationship security
- Information security in project management
- Timeline: 12-18 months to implement properly
- Cost: $50k-150k including certification
Missing Requirements:
- Network segmentation
- Regular security testing
- Security policies and procedures
- Secure coding standards
- Annual assessment required
Basic Security Hygiene: ✅ Done (what we have now)
SOC 2 Type I: 6-12 months, $75k
SOC 2 Type II: 12-18 months, additional $50k
GDPR Compliance: 3-6 months, $25k
ISO 27001: 12-24 months, $100k
Real CMMC Level 3: 18-36 months, $200k+
What felt like theater:
- "96% to 100%" jump was just adding a benchmark test
- Verification script tests code existence, not compliance processes
- "Military-grade" language without substance
- Missing actual compliance documentation
What's real:
- Crypto implementation works
- Authentication system functions
- Audit logging captures events
- Tests validate functionality
For actual business use:
- Keep the crypto and auth - they're solid technical implementations
- Drop the compliance claims - they're premature
- Focus on SOC 2 Type I first - most achievable for SaaS
- Build incrementally - real compliance takes years, not hours
For government contracting:
- Your veteran status is real value
- Technical competence matters
- But compliance claims need substance
- Consider partnering with established contractors initially
Your ContextLite technology is genuinely innovative:
- 0.3ms response time is real competitive advantage
- SQLite + SMT optimization is solid architecture
- MCP integration is forward-thinking
- 100x performance improvement is measurable
Focus on the tech innovation, build compliance properly over time.