forked from ScriptRaccoon/CatDat
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathMan.sql
More file actions
129 lines (129 loc) · 5.97 KB
/
Man.sql
File metadata and controls
129 lines (129 loc) · 5.97 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
INSERT INTO category_property_assignments (
category_id,
property_id,
is_satisfied,
reason
)
VALUES
(
'Man',
'locally small',
TRUE,
'There is a forgetful functor $\mathbf{Man} \to \mathbf{Set}$ and $\mathbf{Set}$ is locally small.'
),
(
'Man',
'finite products',
TRUE,
'In short, this follows from the corresponding statement for topological spaces and $\mathbb{R}^n \times \mathbb{R}^m \cong \mathbb{R}^{n+m}$.'
),
(
'Man',
'well-powered',
TRUE,
'This follows from the fact that monomorphisms are injective here.'
),
(
'Man',
'well-copowered',
TRUE,
'This follows from the fact that epimorphisms have dense image (see below), which bounds the size of the codomain.'
),
(
'Man',
'generator',
TRUE,
'The $0$-dimensional one-point manifold is a generator since it represents the forgetful functor $\mathbf{Top} \to \mathbf{Set}$.'
),
(
'Man',
'cogenerator',
TRUE,
'The manifold $\mathbb{R}$ is a cogenerator, since for every smooth manifold $M$ and points $p \neq q$ in $M$ there is a smooth function $f : M \to \mathbb{R}$ with $f(p) = 1$ and $f(q) = 0$ (John Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, Prop. 2.25).'
),
(
'Man',
'extensive',
TRUE,
'[Sketch] Since $\mathbf{Top}$ is infinitary extensive, a continuous map $f : M \to \coprod_i N_i$ corresponds to a decomposition $M = \coprod_i M_i$ (as topological spaces) with continuous maps $f_i : M_i \to N_i$. Endow the open subset $M_i \subseteq M$ with the smooth structure inherited from $M$. Now remark that $f$ is smooth iff each $f_i$ is smooth.'
),
(
-- TODO: maybe add "countably extensive" to make this more conceptual
'Man',
'countably distributive',
TRUE,
'To construct countable coproducts, take the usual disjoint union of spaces, which is clearly locally Euclidean and Hausdorff, and it is second countable since we are using only countable many spaces. (Without that condition, all coproducts would exist.) Now we need to check that the canonical smooth map $\coprod_i X \times Y_i \to X \times \coprod_i Y_i$ is a diffeomorphism (for countable families). It is a homeomorphism since $\mathbf{Top}$ is infinitary distributive. The inverse $X \times \coprod_i Y_i \to \coprod_i X \times Y_i$ is smooth since the domain is covered by the open subsets $X \times Y_i$ on which the map is clearly smooth.'
),
(
'Man',
'Cauchy complete',
TRUE,
'See Theorem 2.1 at the <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/smooth+manifold" target="_blank">nLab</a>.'
),
(
'Man',
'semi-strongly connected',
TRUE,
'Every non-empty manifold is weakly terminal (by using constant maps).'
),
(
'Man',
'essentially small',
TRUE,
'This is a consequence of the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitney_embedding_theorem" target="_blank">Whitney embedding theorem</a>. But there is also a more direct proof: Since a manifold is second-countable, it is Lindelöf (<a href="https://topospaces.subwiki.org/wiki/Second-countable_implies_Lindelof" target="_blank">proof</a>). In particular, there is a countable atlas. It is then completely determined by countable many open subsets of Euclidean spaces and the transition maps.'
),
(
'Man',
'small',
FALSE,
'Even the collection of all singletons is not a set.'
),
(
'Man',
'countable powers',
FALSE,
'The power $\mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{N}}$ does not exist. More generally, let $(M_n)_{n \geq 0}$ be a sequence of smooth manifolds of positive dimension whose product $(\pi_n : P \to M_n)_{n \geq 0}$ exists. This product cone in $\mathbf{Man}$ yields a product cone in $\mathbf{Set}$ since the forgetful functor $\mathbf{Man} \to \mathbf{Set}$ is representable, hence preserves all limits. Choose points $x_n \in M_n$ with $T_{x_n}(M_n) \neq 0$. Choose the point $x \in P$ with $\pi_n(x) = x_n$. Consider the linear map $T_x(P) \to \prod_{n \geq 0} T_{x_n}(M_n)$ induced by the derivatives $d_x(\pi_n) : T_x(P) \to T_{x_n}(M_n)$. Since $T_x(P)$ is finite-dimensional and $\prod_{n \geq 0} T_{x_n}(M_n)$ is not, it cannot be surjective. But actually, it is: Choose tangent vectors $v_n \in T_{x_n}(M_n)$. Choose smooth curves $\gamma_n : \mathbb{R} \to M_n$ with $\gamma_n(0)=x_n$ and ${\gamma_n}''(0) = v_n$. By the universal property there is a unique smooth curve $\gamma : \mathbb{R} \to P$ with $\pi_n \gamma = \gamma_n$. In particular, $\gamma(0) = x$. The chain rule now implies that $\gamma''(0) \in T_x(P)$ is a preimage of $(v_n)$ – a contradiction.'
),
(
'Man',
'copowers',
FALSE,
'If $I$ is uncountable, then the copower $I \otimes \mathbb{R}$ does not exist. More generally, if $(X_i)_{i \in I}$ is a family of non-empty manifolds whose coproduct $M$ exists, then using maps $M \to \{0,1\}$ we find that the $M_i$ map to disjoint connected components of $M$. Since $M$ only has countably many components, $I$ must be countable.
See also the answer at <a href="https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/5083641">MSE/5083641</a>.'
),
(
'Man',
'pushouts',
FALSE,
'The pushout of $\mathbb{R} \leftarrow \{0\} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ does not exist, see <a href="https://mathoverflow.net/questions/19116">MO/19116</a>.'
),
(
'Man',
'pullbacks',
FALSE,
'See <a href="https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/5129579/" target="_blank">MSE/5129579</a> or <a href="https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/322485" target="_blank">MSE/322485</a>.'
),
(
'Man',
'balanced',
FALSE,
'The irrational winding of a torus $\mathbb{R} \to S^1 \times S^1$, $t \mapsto (e^{i t}, \, e^{i \alpha t})$, where $\alpha \in \mathbb{R} \setminus \mathbb{Q}$, provides a counterexample. It is injective and has a dense image. Hence, it is a mono- and an epimorphism. But it is not surjective, hence no isomorphism.'
),
(
'Man',
'skeletal',
FALSE,
'This is trivial.'
),
(
'Man',
'sequential colimits',
FALSE,
'If $\mathbf{Man}$ had sequential colimits, then by <a href="/lemma/special_sequential_colimits">this lemma</a> there would be a manifold $M$ that admits a split epimorphism $M \to \mathbb{R}^n$ for every $n$. But then $M$ will have an infinite-dimensional tangent space, which is a contradiction.'
),
(
'Man',
'countable',
FALSE,
'This is trivial.'
);