Skip to content

🔗 Expand, simplify TAD scopes#13

Merged
JFWooten4 merged 12 commits intomainfrom
final-tar-srcs
Jan 4, 2025
Merged

🔗 Expand, simplify TAD scopes#13
JFWooten4 merged 12 commits intomainfrom
final-tar-srcs

Conversation

@JFWooten4
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Need to start cleaning up TAR, so I’ll get the last main context points in play. ⌨️ The next course of action for me will be going through the 2003-era SRO governance adjustments on the Commission level.1 Along the path of doing that, I’ll do my best to get things into complete sentences ASAP. 🫱🏼‍🫲🏽

Footnotes

  1. A proper analysis of this requires a fairly extensive understanding of the Federal securities law changes from 1987–2006, which (as I understand the community today) can only come from myself.

@JFWooten4 JFWooten4 changed the title 🔗 Add last contextual hrefs 🔗 Expand, simplify TAD scopes Dec 2, 2024
@JFWooten4
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

JFWooten4 commented Dec 2, 2024

Let's migrate this into the finalizing January framework as discussed.

@JFWooten4 JFWooten4 self-assigned this Dec 2, 2024
@JFWooten4
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

JFWooten4 commented Dec 13, 2024

This should merge from origin and incorporate some of the reminiscent thoughts from stellar/stellar-docs#723 which fall outside the dev scope:

  • The Stellar network takes a crowdsourced approach to liquidity. Namely, the SDEX gives all users equal access to a global decentralized order book for any pair of assets on he network. Since launching with the genesis of the Stellar network in 2014, the SDEX has processed over 4.6 billion trades worth upwards of $26 billion.

  • Stellar is one of the very few platforms that accounts for liquidity at scale with no centralized party (as associated with grease in the wheels argument, and implicated larger scale).

@JFWooten4
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Renewal request implicates mutual-fund TA per stellar/stellar-protocol#1558 n.9 physical notes.

@JFWooten4
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

There are two outcomes here:

  1. Acknowledgment from the Commission; segue to new proposed rule, congressional hearing, or other action and
  2. No contact ignorance as common in prior communications.

In the case of (2), I think it's best to have the full TAR2 come in Q3 from the Syndicate. This aligns with my general intention to never comment on the same rule more than once. At least, if it's through different organizations, we can have independent reference citations.1

Footnotes

  1. By isolating the comments to identifiable front-facing names, we can measure the impact of particular arguments on the Commission's interpretations of the Acts by means of reference counting.

Comment thread TAR-S7-27-15.md
@JFWooten4 JFWooten4 marked this pull request as ready for review January 4, 2025 16:29
@JFWooten4 JFWooten4 merged commit 4657a8f into main Jan 4, 2025
@JFWooten4 JFWooten4 deleted the final-tar-srcs branch January 4, 2025 16:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done - TAR1

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant