Skip to content

Use Elegant screen style environment for evaluator UI results#192

Merged
rhennigan merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/elegant-code-style
Jun 2, 2026
Merged

Use Elegant screen style environment for evaluator UI results#192
rhennigan merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/elegant-code-style

Conversation

@rhennigan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

The Wolfram Language evaluator builds a deployed notebook for its UI results in makeEvaluatorUIResult. This sets ScreenStyleEnvironment -> "Elegant" on that notebook so evaluator UI results render with the Elegant screen style environment.

Changes

  • Kernel/Tools/WolframLanguageEvaluator.wl: Add ScreenStyleEnvironment -> "Elegant" to the Notebook constructed for evaluator UI results.

Test plan

  • Trigger an evaluator UI result and confirm the deployed notebook renders with the Elegant screen style environment.
  • Verify existing input/output cell rendering (including cell labels) is unaffected.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 1, 2026 19:22
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the Wolfram Language evaluator’s UI-result notebook construction so that deployed evaluator UI results render using the "Elegant" screen style environment.

Changes:

  • Set ScreenStyleEnvironment -> "Elegant" on the Notebook[...] created in makeEvaluatorUIResult.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@rhennigan rhennigan merged commit ec2546a into main Jun 2, 2026
2 checks passed
@rhennigan rhennigan deleted the feature/elegant-code-style branch June 2, 2026 12:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants