Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: dgw <dgw@technobabbl.es>

Author: ozh

IA_POLICY.md

@@ -3,31 +3,35 @@
 The YOURLS project and organization have strict rules regarding AI usage.
 
 - **All AI usage in any form must be disclosed.** You must state
-  the tool you used (e.g. Claude Code) along with the extent that the work
+  the tool you used (e.g. Claude Code) along with the extent to which the work
   was AI-assisted.
 
 - **The human-in-the-loop must fully understand all code.** If you can't explain
   without AI what your changes do and how they interact with code, please do not
   contribute to this project.
 
 - **Any content generated with AI must have been reviewed _and edited_
-  by a human before submission**. AI is very good at being overly verbose and
+  by a human before submission.** AI is very good at being overly verbose and
   including noise that distracts from the main point.
-
+
+- **The human-in-the-loop must communicate with maintainers.** This follows from
+  the preceding points: AI models are verbose and unfocused. Don't have your AI
+  tool describe to us what you've found or changed; say it in your own words.
+
 - **Pull Requests must be focused.** If you want to submit a PR that fixes a
   problem, enhances or introduce a new feature, make sure your code does just
-  that. PR containing also white space changes, rewording comments, or
-  tackling several matters will be rejected.
+  that. PRs that change whitespace, reword comments, or contain multiple
+  unrelated sets of changes will be rejected.
 
 ## There are Humans Here
 
 Please remember that YOURLS is maintained by humans.
 
-Every discussion, issue, and pull request is read and reviewed by
-humans. It is a boundary point at which people interact with each other
-and the work done. It is rude and disrespectful to approach this boundary
-with low-effort, unqualified work, since it puts the burden of validation
-on the maintainer.
+Every discussion, issue, and pull request is read and reviewed by humans.
+It is a boundary point at which people interact with each other and guide
+the work. It is rude and disrespectful to approach this boundary with
+low-effort, unqualified contributions that put the burden of validation
+on the maintainers.
 
 **This AI Policy is not an anti AI stance.** It's our way to preserve our
 limited time and resources devoted to this community project.