Skip to content

feat: add CODEOWNERS for automated review routing #41

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
abhizipstack wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
+22 −0
Open

feat: add CODEOWNERS for automated review routing #41

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
22 changes: 22 additions & 0 deletions .github/CODEOWNERS
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
# Default — all PRs require review from L1 reviewers
* @Zipstack/visitran-reviewers-l1

# Backend
/backend/ @Zipstack/visitran-reviewers-l1 @Zipstack/visitran-reviewers-l2

# Frontend
/frontend/ @Zipstack/visitran-reviewers-l1

# Core library
/visitran/ @Zipstack/visitran-reviewers-l2

# Tests
/tests/ @Zipstack/visitran-reviewers-l1

# CI/CD and infrastructure
/.github/ @Zipstack/visitran-admins
/docker/ @Zipstack/visitran-admins
Comment on lines +17 to +18
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot Apr 6, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 ci/ directory not covered by admin rule

The ci/ directory exists at the repo root and contains pipeline scripts (notably increment_version.py). It has no explicit rule and silently falls back to the * catch-all — routing reviews to L1 only. Since /.github/ and /docker/ are both explicitly assigned to @Zipstack/visitran-admins due to their infrastructure nature, ci/ should receive the same treatment for consistency:

Suggested change
/.github/ @Zipstack/visitran-admins
/docker/ @Zipstack/visitran-admins
# CI/CD and infrastructure
/.github/ @Zipstack/visitran-admins
/docker/ @Zipstack/visitran-admins
/ci/ @Zipstack/visitran-admins
Prompt To Fix With AI 
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: .github/CODEOWNERS
Line: 17-18

Comment:
**`ci/` directory not covered by admin rule**

The `ci/` directory exists at the repo root and contains pipeline scripts (notably `increment_version.py`). It has no explicit rule and silently falls back to the `*` catch-all — routing reviews to L1 only. Since `/.github/` and `/docker/` are both explicitly assigned to `@Zipstack/visitran-admins` due to their infrastructure nature, `ci/` should receive the same treatment for consistency:

```suggestion
# CI/CD and infrastructure
/.github/ @Zipstack/visitran-admins
/docker/ @Zipstack/visitran-admins
/ci/ @Zipstack/visitran-admins
```

How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.


# Documentation
/*.md @Zipstack/visitran-reviewers-l1
/docs/ @Zipstack/visitran-reviewers-l1
Loading