Fix-up an accidental use of SPDX's WITH operator in a rule (#3628)

The text denoted by the ID `facebook-patent-rights-2` actually contains
a patent license, not a license exception. So, that ID must not be use
as right-hand-side operand of the the `WITH` operation.

Signed-off-by: Frank Viernau <frank_viernau@epam.com>

Author: fviernau

…tent-rights-2_or_gpl-2.0_facebook_1.RULE …tent-rights-2_or_gpl-2.0_facebook_1.RULEsrc/licensedcode/data/rules/bsd-new_with_facebook-patent-rights-2_or_gpl-2.0_facebook_1.RULE renamed to src/licensedcode/data/rules/bsd-new_and_facebook-patent-rights-2_or_gpl-2.0_facebook_1.RULE src/licensedcode/data/rules/bsd-new_with_facebook-patent-rights-2_or_gpl-2.0_facebook_1.RULE renamed to src/licensedcode/data/rules/bsd-new_and_facebook-patent-rights-2_or_gpl-2.0_facebook_1.RULE

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ---
-license_expression: bsd-new WITH facebook-patent-rights-2 OR gpl-2.0
+license_expression: bsd-new AND facebook-patent-rights-2 OR gpl-2.0
 is_license_notice: yes
 referenced_filenames:
     - LICENSE