Skip to content

chore: sync main with upstream 0.2.0#3

Open
akurtz wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
akurtz/codex/sync-main-merge-upstream-20260221
Open

chore: sync main with upstream 0.2.0#3
akurtz wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
akurtz/codex/sync-main-merge-upstream-20260221

Conversation

@akurtz

@akurtz akurtz commented Feb 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Syncs fork with latest upstream/main (0.2.0)

@augmentcode

augmentcode Bot commented Feb 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: This PR syncs the fork’s main branch with upstream release 0.2.0.

Changes:

  • Bumped package.json version from 0.1.5 to 0.2.0.
  • Updated PR review guideline template to emphasize high-confidence feedback and explicitly list review areas to avoid.
  • Simplified the base instruction template to focus solely on PR code review responsibilities.
  • Trimmed the limitations template by removing team/scope/QA sections, leaving core decision-making, execution, and tool constraints.

Technical Notes: The changes primarily affect prompt/template content used by the action; no runtime logic changes are introduced.

🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎

@augmentcode augmentcode Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review completed. 2 suggestions posted.

Fix All in Augment

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

- **Documentation**: Check if documentation is consistent with the code.

### Review Areas to Avoid:
- **Code Style**:

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The entries under ### Review Areas to Avoid: like - **Code Style**: / - **Performance**: are currently empty (and include trailing :), which may read like a formatting mistake and reduce clarity of the generated guidance.

Severity: low

Fix This in Augment

🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎, or 🚀 if it prevented an incident/outage.

- "This could lead to a race condition if multiple threads access... Consider using..."
- "The current implementation has O(n²) complexity. You could optimize this by..."
- "This input isn't validated, which could lead to security issues. Consider adding..."
- Consider existing reviews, do not be repetitive with other reviews No newline at end of file

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This file ends without a trailing newline, which can cause unnecessary diff churn and tooling warnings when editing/formatting.

Severity: low

Fix This in Augment

🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎, or 🚀 if it prevented an incident/outage.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants