use 'cannot' (one word) in two prose passages

Author: BojunChai

README.md

@@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ Other Style Guides
   <a name="functions--spread-vs-apply"></a><a name="7.14"></a>
   - [7.14](#functions--spread-vs-apply) Prefer the use of the spread syntax `...` to call variadic functions. eslint: [`prefer-spread`](https://eslint.org/docs/rules/prefer-spread)
 
-    > Why? It’s cleaner, you don’t need to supply a context, and you can not easily compose `new` with `apply`.
+    > Why? It’s cleaner, you don’t need to supply a context, and you cannot easily compose `new` with `apply`.
 
     ```javascript
     // bad
@@ -3535,7 +3535,7 @@ Other Style Guides
     ```
 
   <a name="naming--uppercase"></a>
-  - [23.10](#naming--uppercase) You may optionally uppercase a constant only if it (1) is exported, (2) is a `const` (it can not be reassigned), and (3) the programmer can trust it (and its nested properties) to never change.
+  - [23.10](#naming--uppercase) You may optionally uppercase a constant only if it (1) is exported, (2) is a `const` (it cannot be reassigned), and (3) the programmer can trust it (and its nested properties) to never change.
 
     > Why? This is an additional tool to assist in situations where the programmer would be unsure if a variable might ever change. UPPERCASE_VARIABLES are letting the programmer know that they can trust the variable (and its properties) not to change.
     - What about all `const` variables? - This is unnecessary, so uppercasing should not be used for constants within a file. It should be used for exported constants however.