-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
feat: add intermediate state checkpointing during pagination #915
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
devin-ai-integration
wants to merge
4
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
devin/1771602439-intermediate-state-checkpoint
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
92d4fad
feat: add intermediate state checkpointing during pagination
devin-ai-integration[bot] fed6100
fix: ruff format and add unit tests for intermediate checkpointing
devin-ai-integration[bot] e0ef3eb
feat: add pages_per_checkpoint_interval to declarative schema for inc…
devin-ai-integration[bot] 967e09a
fix: add missing slices key guard in else branch of emit_intermediate…
devin-ai-integration[bot] File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🟡 Missing
"slices"key check inelsebranch ofemit_intermediate_statecan cause KeyErrorIn
emit_intermediate_state, theif self._slice_boundary_fields:branch (line 301) correctly checksif "slices" not in self._concurrent_state: return. However, theelsebranch (line 313) directly accessesself._concurrent_state["slices"].append(...)without this guard. While_concurrent_stateshould almost always have"slices", this is inconsistent with the defensive check in the sibling branch and with_add_slice_to_state(cursor.py:331) which raises aRuntimeErrorwhen"slices"is missing. If_concurrent_statesomehow lacks"slices", this will raise aKeyErrorinstead of gracefully returning or raising a descriptive error.Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch — added the missing
"slices"key guard in theelsebranch to be consistent with theifbranch. Fixed in 967e09a.Devin session