fix(source-monday): Add WaitTimeFromHeader backoff strategy

[Anatolii Yatsuk (tolik0)]

What

Added WaitTimeFromHeader backoff strategy to handle retries using the retry-after header, improving efficiency and aligning with rate-limit resets.
Oncall: https://github.com/airbytehq/oncall/issues/6858

How

Updated manifest.yaml with WaitTimeFromHeader and fallback ConstantBackoffStrategy.

User Impact

Improved retry logic: Reduces unnecessary delays.

Can this PR be safely reverted and rolled back?

• YES 💚
• NO ❌

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
airbyte-docs	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Mar 23, 2025 1:30pm

[Ian (ianmeigh)]

Hi all, I saw this PR was approved a while back but hasn’t been merged yet. I was just wondering if there’s a timeline for merging this into the main branch for release or if there are any blockers that still need to be addressed.

This would be really useful to address a problem I am experiencing in my project. I’d love to know if there’s anything I can do to help move it forward. I appreciate all the work that’s gone into this!

[Aldo Gonzalez (aldogonzalez8)]

Hi all, I saw this PR was approved a while back but hasn’t been merged yet. I was just wondering if there’s a timeline for merging this into the main branch for release or if there are any blockers that still need to be addressed.

This would be really useful to address a problem I am experiencing in my project. I’d love to know if there’s anything I can do to help move it forward. I appreciate all the work that’s gone into this!

Ian (@ianmeigh) Let me check if I can update this PR and get it merged.

[Aldo Gonzalez (aldogonzalez8)]

This will likely have to be force merged since the pyairbyte test requires 3.10, but we will be using 3.9 for a little longer until we bump this to cdk 6 next week according to this.

cc Natik Gadzhi (@natikgadzhi) Maxime Carbonneau-Leclerc (@maxi297) with super powers.

[Maxime Carbonneau-Leclerc (maxi297)]

Aldo Gonzalez (@aldogonzalez8) should we run a bunch of regression tests to double check then? Else, how far off is the update to cdk version 6? I know Anatolii Yatsuk (@tolik0) had this in a PR soon to be merged

[Aldo Gonzalez (aldogonzalez8)]

how far off is the update to cdk version 6? I know Anatolii Yatsuk (@tolik0) had this in a PR soon to be merged

I would be interested, as this could be included, or at least we could hold to see this test passing. Anatolii Yatsuk (@tolik0) how far are we to update to cdk version 6?

Aldo Gonzalez (@aldogonzalez8) should we run a bunch of regression tests to double check then?

I can do it if we are not close to bum CDK v6. In the meantime, let me see if I can put something quick to run anyway.

[Maxime Carbonneau-Leclerc (maxi297)]

Ian (@ianmeigh) , this feature should have been added here as part of this PR