-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
setup-policy-routes start: infinite sysfs wait loop causes unbounded process accumulation on ECS hosts #149
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
joeysk2012
merged 4 commits into
amazonlinux:main
from
ddermendzhiev:fix/setup-policy-routes-sysfs-timeout
Apr 3, 2026
+21
−2
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
26a67ce
setup-policy-routes: add sysfs wait timeout and stale lock detection
9fad70b
falsy ((counter++)) needs || true when counter = 0
097d289
lib/lib.sh: lower register_networkd_reloader() max (spin time) to mat…
65fbb03
setup-policy-routes: disable refresh time and prevent restart using e…
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could there be a race condtion when two PIDs clash and a lock file is removed by accident?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, good catch. If the PID is reassigned to a another setup-policy-routes process which acquires the lock after the
! kill -0 "$existing_pid"check, this code would then delete a valid lockfile. This is very unlikely, but let's consider it.I dont think an atomic operation is possible purely with shell code.
What if we also add a check on the lockfile age? We can use the same value that we set for the sysfs wait timeout (original is 300s) as a stale threshold? Only if the lockfile is older than that timeout, can we consider it stale.
Something like:
Note: the threshold should stay in sync with max_wait * 0.1 from the sysfs wait timeout
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like this approach but I am also okay with not adding more complication since the PID space is quite large.