Skip to content

upstream: official claude code updates 2026-06-29#223

Draft
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
auto/official-20260629-1950
Draft

upstream: official claude code updates 2026-06-29#223
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
auto/official-20260629-1950

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

upstream changes detected

sources: anthropic/official-docs
changes found: 1
files edited: 4
staleness flags: 4

what changed upstream

  • [docs_change] Official Claude Code docs updated (link)

staleness flags

file claim reality severity
docs/tips/fast-mode.md fast mode keeps you on opus. it does not switch to a cheaper or smaller model. official docs now emphasize fast mode as a narrow latency toggle separate from effort levels. the interaction is more complex than stated. medium
docs/tips/plan-mode.md plan mode is described as a single feature toggle with /plan official docs structure suggests plan mode may have deeper integration with planning agents and exploration patterns that the repo doc doesn't detail low
docs/cost.md caching saves ~81% of costs, 95% overall cache hit rate official pricing and caching docs may have updated billing mechanics or cache hit rate expectations since v2.1.122 verification medium
docs/session-workflow.md 32% of 30-60 min sessions needed compaction, 54% of 2hr+ sessions did these percentages are session-specific analytics from the repo author. official docs may show different compaction patterns for typical users low

proposed edits

  • docs/tips/fast-mode.md: official docs now clarify effort/fast mode relationship; repo doc repeats content and has outdated framing
  • docs/session-workflow.md: cost and compaction docs cite v2.1.122-specific data; current versions may have different defaults
  • docs/tips/context-management.md: repo claims are based on v2.1.122 session data; official docs now provide /doctor tooling for verification
  • docs/cost.md: cost doc heavily cites v2.1.122 behavior; official pricing and billing have likely evolved
  • docs/tips/hooks-v2.md: official docs now recommend /doctor for platform-specific capability checking; repo doc doesn't mention this

review checklist

  • staleness flags accurate?
  • version numbers and pricing correct?
  • proposed edits read naturally?

auto-generated by official-watcher

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants