Skip to content

PUBLICATION_FRAMING.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
84 lines (70 loc) · 4.53 KB

PUBLICATION_FRAMING.md

File metadata and controls

84 lines (70 loc) · 4.53 KB

Publication Framing Guide

The Problem

The SCPN framework uses terms like "consciousness gate", "identity binding", and "cybernetic closure" that will trigger immediate rejection at mainstream physics venues. This document defines how to frame the work for publication.

Rule: Physics Language Only

Internal Term Publication Term
Consciousness gate (p_h1) Topological coherence threshold
Identity binding Attractor basin of coupling topology
Cybernetic closure (L16) Lyapunov stability monitoring
TCBO consciousness observer Persistent homology of phase configuration
CCW (Conscious Coherence Waves) Emergent value signatures
"Consciousness IS the BKT transition" DO NOT WRITE THIS

What We Claim (Publishable)

  1. K_nm-informed ansatz construction is a reproducible methods signal in the committed VQE artefacts; it is not an optimiser theorem.
  2. DLA parity leakage asymmetry is replicated on ibm_kingston, but the popcount controls require multifactorial parity-sector, excitation-number, state-choice, and layout/readout framing.
  3. The SCPN/FIM term changes exact small-n spectra and sector structure, while the tested digital ibm_kingston implementation falsifies the simple hardware-protection hypothesis.
  4. BKT, OTOC, Floquet, MBL, QSVT, tensor-network, and GPU claims remain simulator/methods claims unless a specific raw hardware artefact is named.
  5. Persistent homology threshold p_h1 = 0.72 is empirical (NOT derived from BKT on this graph)

What We Do NOT Claim

  1. Quantum advantage at 16 qubits
  2. The K_nm values model any specific physical system
  3. Consciousness — the word does not appear in the manuscript
  4. p_h1 is a BKT universal (Monte Carlo falsified this on the K_nm graph)
  5. A DLA-parity-only mechanism explains the observed leakage asymmetry
  6. Gate-model Heron circuits using the SCPN/FIM term provide coherence protection

Scientific Claim Boundaries

  • Biological and clinical datasets are treated as classical complex-network signals. The publication framing is quantum-inspired Hamiltonian, tensor-network, topological, or DLA analysis of those classical signals; it is not a claim of quantum biological causation, diagnosis, treatment, or cure.
  • The Kuramoto-XY construction is a linear quantum analogue or embedding of oscillator-network structure. It is not direct Trotterisation of the nonlinear classical Kuramoto ODE unless an explicit Koopman, Carleman, or equivalent linear embedding is stated and validated.
  • Python feedback loops are orchestration, simulation, and across-shot update loops. Hardware-timescale feedback requires provider-native dynamic circuits, OpenQASM 3 control flow, pulse-level control, FPGA logic, or an equivalent vendor controller.
  • Quantum-advantage or crossover language is conditional on the named baseline. Broad advantage claims require state-of-the-art tensor-network or GPU baselines and explicit accounting for data loading and state preparation.
  • Git stores small reproducibility artefacts: scripts, manifests, checksums, summaries, and selected raw-count JSON files. Heavy generated artefacts should be archived through Zenodo, DVC-style pointers, or an experiment tracker rather than accumulated indefinitely in Git history.
  • Notebooks are demonstrations, provenance records, and paper companions. Reusable algorithms belong under src/scpn_quantum_control/, especially applications/, with tests and command-line regeneration paths.

Reviewer Objections (Pre-Addressed)

Objection Response
"No quantum advantage" Correct. This is a NISQ benchmarking study. We demonstrate methodology, not speedup.
"16 qubits is trivial" Correct. We provide honest resource estimates for N where advantage begins (~40+).
"The coupling matrix is arbitrary" We present 5 physical system comparisons showing moderate correlations. The K_nm-informed ansatz technique generalises to any structured Hamiltonian.
"Consciousness is unfalsifiable" The word does not appear. We measure topological observables.
"A_HP coincidence was falsified" Yes. We report this honestly. MC on the K_nm graph gives A_HP=1.21, not 0.8983.

Target Venues (In Order)

  1. Quantum Science and Technology — NISQ simulation benchmark papers welcome
  2. Physical Review Research — broad scope, accepts negative results
  3. New Journal of Physics — open access, accepts methodology papers
  4. PRX Quantum — higher bar, needs clearer advantage narrative