Skip to content

Add missing format strings to logging calls in the Go SDK - #36192

Merged
jrmccluskey merged 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
jrmccluskey:formatFix
Sep 18, 2025
Merged

Add missing format strings to logging calls in the Go SDK#36192
jrmccluskey merged 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
jrmccluskey:formatFix

Conversation

@jrmccluskey

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Some errors in the Go Coverage runs started to surface around logging format calls missing a const format string, instead just dropping the output in. This works but can cause issues (and is now caught during testing) so adding some simple formatting strings solves that issue.


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @jrmccluskey, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request resolves issues identified during Go Coverage runs related to incorrect usage of logging functions in the Go SDK. The changes involve adding explicit "%s" format strings to various logging calls where a single string was previously passed directly. This ensures compliance with Go's logging API expectations, improving the overall stability and preventing potential errors in the Go SDK's logging mechanisms.

Highlights

  • Go Logging Format Strings: Corrected several Errorf, Printf, and Infof calls across the Go SDK to explicitly use "%s" as a format string when logging a single string variable. This addresses issues where Go's logging functions expect a format string as the first argument, preventing potential runtime errors or unexpected behavior that surfaced during Go Coverage runs.
  • Improved Code Robustness: By ensuring proper format string usage in logging calls, the change enhances the robustness and correctness of the Go SDK, aligning with best practices for Go's fmt package and similar logging interfaces.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@jrmccluskey

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@gemini-code-review review

@jrmccluskey

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

R: @damccorm @shunping the python failures are unrelated

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control. If you'd like to restart, comment assign set of reviewers

@shunping shunping left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@damccorm damccorm left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@jrmccluskey
jrmccluskey merged commit db18391 into apache:master Sep 18, 2025
104 of 112 checks passed
@jrmccluskey
jrmccluskey deleted the formatFix branch September 18, 2025 17:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants