Skip to content

fix flakey fileiotest#39174

Open
derrickaw wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom
20260630_fixCodeCompletionFlakeyTest
Open

fix flakey fileiotest#39174
derrickaw wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom
20260630_fixCodeCompletionFlakeyTest

Conversation

@derrickaw

@derrickaw derrickaw commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
  1. Seeing code completion workflow failing for one particular test intermently - https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/39052/checks?check_run_id=84352903375
  2. With fix - https://github.com/apache/beam/actions/runs/28451839546

Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the java label Jun 30, 2026
@derrickaw

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/gemini review

@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Gemini encountered an error creating the review. You can try again by commenting /gemini review.

@derrickaw

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/gemini review

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a custom termination condition AfterNumberOfNewOutputs in FileIOTest.java to improve the reliability of testMatchWatchForNewFiles by stopping polling after a specific number of outputs or a 10-second timeout. The feedback points out that using numFiles for the single-file update matcher is conceptually incorrect and fragile, and suggests using a literal value instead.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

Comment thread sdks/java/core/src/test/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/FileIOTest.java Outdated
@derrickaw derrickaw marked this pull request as ready for review June 30, 2026 16:34
@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses intermittent failures in the 'FileIOTest' suite by improving the reliability of file watching tests. By replacing purely time-based termination conditions with a hybrid approach that includes a count-based condition, the tests are now less susceptible to environmental latency during CI execution.

Highlights

  • Termination Condition Implementation: Introduced a new 'AfterNumberOfNewOutputs' termination condition to provide a deterministic way to stop polling in tests.
  • Flaky Test Resolution: Updated 'testMatchWatchForNewFiles' to use 'Watch.Growth.eitherOf' combining the new termination condition with a longer timeout, reducing flakiness caused by timing sensitivity.
New Features

🧠 You can now enable Memory (public preview) to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize the Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counterproductive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a custom termination condition AfterNumberOfNewOutputs in FileIOTest.java to stop polling after a specific number of new outputs, and updates testMatchWatchForNewFiles to use this condition in combination with a larger timeout. The review feedback suggests defensively handling potential NullPointerException issues caused by auto-unboxing of the nullable Integer state parameter in the onSeenNewOutput and canStopPolling methods.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

Comment thread sdks/java/core/src/test/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/FileIOTest.java
Comment thread sdks/java/core/src/test/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/FileIOTest.java
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 57.78%. Comparing base (30a5a00) to head (444a8ff).
⚠️ Report is 10 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #39174      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     55.33%   57.78%   +2.44%     
- Complexity     2198    13054   +10856     
============================================
  Files          1107     2514    +1407     
  Lines        172166   262054   +89888     
  Branches       1417    10746    +9329     
============================================
+ Hits          95267   151419   +56152     
- Misses        74462   104905   +30443     
- Partials       2437     5730    +3293     
Flag Coverage Δ
java 64.21% <ø> (-11.18%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Assigning reviewers:

R: @ahmedabu98 for label java.

Note: If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer.

Available commands:

  • stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
  • remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
  • waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant