You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
fix: Set Substrait output types for expressions (#20597)
## Which issue does this PR close?
<!--
We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases.
You can link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example
`Closes#123` indicates that this PR will close issue #123.
-->
- Closes#15831.
## Rationale for this change
<!--
Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly
in the issue then this section is not needed.
Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand
your changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.
-->
The Substrait producer did not set the ScalarFunction `output_type` when
converting binary expressions, which broke consumers relying on the
`output_type`.
## What changes are included in this PR?
<!--
There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it
is sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this
PR.
-->
* Refactor `from_join` and `from_between` to eliminate direct calls to
`make_binary_op_scalar_func`
* Set the Substrait ScalarFunction `output_type` when converting several
types of DataFusion expressions:
* Binary expressions (`Expr::BinaryExpr`)
* Unary expressions (like `Expr::Not`)
* Scalar functions (`Expr::ScalarFunction`)
There are a few more places where the `output_type` has not been set,
such as `from_like` and `from_in_list`, as mentioned in #15831. I've
left these out of scope here as fixing them would require more
substantial code changes.
## Are these changes tested?
<!--
We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code
If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example,
are they covered by existing tests)?
-->
Yes, via a new unit test.
## Are there any user-facing changes?
<!--
If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be
updated before approving the PR.
-->
<!--
If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please add the `api
change` label.
-->
No, beyond the Substrait output fix.
0 commit comments