feat: extend interval analysis support for temporal types#21520
Open
buraksenn wants to merge 3 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Open
feat: extend interval analysis support for temporal types#21520buraksenn wants to merge 3 commits intoapache:mainfrom
buraksenn wants to merge 3 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
logical-expr
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
related with #21109 and its PR #21473
Rationale for this change
Temporal types can actually support internal arithmetics and with this change internal arithmetics can now narrow down column boundaries and selectivity instead of falling back to default selectivity of 1.0
What changes are included in this PR?
Extend internal_arithmetic types with date and duration types
Are these changes tested?
Yes adjusted tests
Are there any user-facing changes?
no