docs: Improvements of PPE docs#1875
Conversation
![cursor[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1210556?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This PR is being reviewed by Cursor Bugbot
Details
Your team is on the Bugbot Free tier. On this plan, Bugbot will review limited PRs each billing cycle for each member of your team.
To receive Bugbot reviews on all of your PRs, please have a team admin upgrade your team to Bugbot Pro by visiting the Cursor dashboard. Your first 14 days will be free!
Comment @cursor review or bugbot run to trigger another review on this PR
|
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
|
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
|
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
metalwarrior665
left a comment
metalwarrior665
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this is a great step forward. I added a few comments to resolve.
patrikbraborec
force-pushed
the
docs/ppe-docs-improvements
branch
from
832beb5 to
951b444
Compare
|
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
|
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
|
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
mhamas
left a comment
mhamas
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In general looks good, thanks! I've left a couple of comments, please, have a look. Thanks!
sources/platform/actors/publishing/monetize/pricing_and_costs.mdx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sources/platform/actors/publishing/monetize/pricing_and_costs.mdx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sources/platform/actors/publishing/monetize/pricing_and_costs.mdx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
Co-authored-by: Michał Olender <92638966+TC-MO@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
|
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
|
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
|
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
|
@metalwarrior665, @mhamas, @TC-MO - I propose to merge it, and solve the open discussion later (I can create follow up issues). What do you think? |
metalwarrior665
left a comment
metalwarrior665
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just a few small comments but I agree that we can relase it and iterate on the pending comments later.
patrikbraborec
force-pushed
the
docs/ppe-docs-improvements
branch
from
b76afbc to
347a605
Compare
|
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
|
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
Co-authored-by: Michał Olender <92638966+TC-MO@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Michał Olender <92638966+TC-MO@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Michał Olender <92638966+TC-MO@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
|
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
TC-MO
left a comment
TC-MO
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, great work, and not an easy task!
5 participants
The following PR improves PPE documentation:
Related:
TODOs:
get_charged_event_countmethod similar to Apify JavaScript SDK (getChargedEventCount). I am discussing with the tooling team about the correct implementation in Actor.get_charged_event_countmethod to the Python SDK.