Skip to content

Simplify the SessionPool interface and allow custom SessionPool implementations #3617

@barjin

Description

@barjin

As discussed under #3599, there is a point in having custom SessionPool implementations. We should decide what the public interface of such a thing should be and then export (and properly document) it.

Related to #3109
Child of #3090

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    t-toolingIssues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team.

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions