-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.1k
Fix incorrect assumption about erc7201 constant function call #16672
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
matheusaaguiar
wants to merge
3
commits into
develop
Choose a base branch
from
fix_erc7201_invalid_param_number_ice
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+44
−1
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions
1
test/libsolidity/syntaxTests/globalFunctions/erc7201_builtin_abi_encode_comptime.sol
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ | ||
| contract C layout at erc7201(string(abi.encodePacked(bytes32(uint256(2))))) {} | ||
| // ---- | ||
| // TypeError 9796: (29-74): Invalid argument type for erc7201 function. Expected literal or constant string. | ||
| // TypeError 1505: (21-75): The base slot expression contains elements that are not yet supported by the internal constant evaluator and therefore cannot be evaluated at compilation time. |
6 changes: 6 additions & 0 deletions
6
test/libsolidity/syntaxTests/globalFunctions/erc7201_builtin_param_invalid_comptime.sol
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | ||
| contract C { | ||
| int[erc7201(123)] a; | ||
| } | ||
| // ---- | ||
| // TypeError 9796: (29-32): Invalid argument type for erc7201 function. Expected literal or constant string. | ||
| // TypeError 5462: (21-33): Invalid array length, expected integer literal or constant expression. |
15 changes: 15 additions & 0 deletions
15
test/libsolidity/syntaxTests/globalFunctions/erc7201_builtin_param_wrong_count_comptime.sol
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ | ||
| contract C { | ||
| uint constant CONST0 = erc7201(); | ||
| uint[CONST0] a; | ||
| uint constant CONST2 = erc7201("12", "34"); | ||
| uint[CONST2] b; | ||
| uint constant CONST3 = erc7201("A", "BC", "D"); | ||
| uint[CONST3] c; | ||
| } | ||
| // ---- | ||
| // TypeError 8248: (40-49): erc7201 function expects 1 parameter, but 0 were given. | ||
| // TypeError 5462: (60-66): Invalid array length, expected integer literal or constant expression. | ||
| // TypeError 8248: (98-117): erc7201 function expects 1 parameter, but 2 were given. | ||
| // TypeError 5462: (128-134): Invalid array length, expected integer literal or constant expression. | ||
| // TypeError 8248: (166-189): erc7201 function expects 1 parameter, but 3 were given. | ||
| // TypeError 5462: (200-206): Invalid array length, expected integer literal or constant expression. |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you not move this to
TypeChecker?Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The problem here is that for certain cases, like array lengths, the constant folding happens before, during
DeclarationTypeCheckervisits... I could add that there, but feels a bit out of place too.At first, I wanted to rely on TypeChecker and missed that this could be triggered before it was verified (see this comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fair enough