update mini-benchmark table

Author: astanin

README.md

@@ -1172,17 +1172,17 @@ simply joining lists of values with a tab, comma, or other separator.
 At the same time, `tabulate` is comparable to other table
 pretty-printers. Given a 10x10 table (a list of lists) of mixed text and
 numeric data, `tabulate` appears to be faster than `PrettyTable` and `texttable`.
-The following mini-benchmark was run in Python 3.11.9 on Windows 11 (x64):
+The following mini-benchmark was run in Python 3.13.7 on Windows 11 (x64):
 
     ==================================  ==========  ===========
     Table formatter                       time, μs    rel. time
     ==================================  ==========  ===========
-    join with tabs and newlines                6.3          1.0
-    csv to StringIO                            6.6          1.0
-    tabulate (0.10.0)                        249.2         39.3
-    tabulate (0.10.0, WIDE_CHARS_MODE)       325.6         51.4
-    texttable (1.7.0)                        579.3         91.5
-    PrettyTable (3.11.0)                     605.5         95.6
+    csv to StringIO                           11.9          1.0
+    join with tabs and newlines               12.1          1.0
+    PrettyTable (3.17.0)                     468.0         39.3
+    tabulate (0.10.0)                        553.4         46.5
+    tabulate (0.10.0, WIDE_CHARS_MODE)       612.2         51.4
+    texttable (1.7.0)                       1071.4         90.0
     ==================================  ==========  ===========