Skip to content

VS Code extension for BtLL#1152

Open
ARtheboss wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
btll-vscode-extension
Open

VS Code extension for BtLL#1152
ARtheboss wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
btll-vscode-extension

Conversation

@ARtheboss

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Created BtLL extension for VS Code that auto-lints and colorifies any string that looks like

`
// BtLL
[BtLL code]
`

As per the request of @NathanDai5287

@ARtheboss ARtheboss requested a review from NathanDai5287 June 10, 2026 19:06

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: b0687858a0

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread btll-linter/src/linter.ts
Comment on lines +66 to +68
"NumberRequirement",
"Course",
]);

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Include course helpers in the builtin set

The linter hard-codes valid builtins but omits the course-library functions registered in packages/BtLL/src/lib/course.ts (one_common_course, common_course_matches, take_until_units, etc.). Any marked real requirement block that uses these interpreter-supported helpers without a ${...} import line, such as the newly marked business/econ BtLL strings, will now be underlined with Unknown function or variable warnings even though the code executes correctly.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant