test: cover reply channel with null address

[YforC]

Why

Issue #876 describes a resolved-document validation edge case where an operation reply uses address.location and references a reply channel whose address is null. Current master already accepts this scenario, but there was no focused regression coverage for it.

Related to #876.

What Changed

Added a v3 resolved validation test showing that a reply channel with address: null is valid when the reply address is supplied via address.location.

Verification

• npm install
• npx jest test/ruleset/rules/asyncapi-document-resolved.spec.ts --runInBand
• npm run parser:build

npm run parser:test:unit still has existing external-reference timeout failures unrelated to this test.

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: eaa74bc

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud