cleanup: remove deprecated semantics method from StepConfig#476
Merged
Conversation
nvasiu
reviewed
Jun 19, 2026
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We can reuse isAtMostOnce() here now.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actually isRetryable is always true. I removed it in the next commit
nvasiu
approved these changes
Jun 19, 2026
nvasiu
approved these changes
Jun 19, 2026
nvasiu
approved these changes
Jun 19, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
Issue Link, if available
Fix #452
Description
Remove the deprecated
semanticsmethod fromStepConfigDemo/Screenshots
Checklist
Testing
Unit Tests
Have unit tests been written for these changes? Updated
Integration Tests
Have integration tests been written for these changes? Updated
Examples
Has a new example been added for the change? (if applicable)