Skip to content

Add a workaround for connection acquire issue#6808

Merged
dagnir merged 6 commits intomasterfrom
dongie/endpoint-not-acquired-fix
Mar 27, 2026
Merged

Add a workaround for connection acquire issue#6808
dagnir merged 6 commits intomasterfrom
dongie/endpoint-not-acquired-fix

Conversation

@dagnir
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dagnir dagnir commented Mar 20, 2026

There appears to be an issue in rare circumstances where a connection acquire fails so that no connection is leased from the pool, and validation of the connection subsequently fails, causing the underlying HTTP client to throw.

This adds a workaround for this issue by rethrowing the exception wrapped in an IOException to at least give the upper layer an opportunity to retry the request.

Motivation and Context

Modifications

Testing

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
  • Local run of mvn install succeeds
  • My code follows the code style of this project
  • My change requires a change to the Javadoc documentation
  • I have updated the Javadoc documentation accordingly
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • All new and existing tests passed
  • I have added a changelog entry. Adding a new entry must be accomplished by running the scripts/new-change script and following the instructions. Commit the new file created by the script in .changes/next-release with your changes.
  • My change is to implement 1.11 parity feature and I have updated LaunchChangelog

License

  • I confirm that this pull request can be released under the Apache 2 license

There appears to be an issue in rare circumstances where a connection
acquire fails so that no connection is leased from the pool, and
validation of the connection subsequently fails, causing the underlying
HTTP client to throw.

This adds a workaround for this issue by rethrowing the exception
wrapped in an IOException to at least give the upper layer an
opportunity to retry the request.
@dagnir dagnir requested a review from a team as a code owner March 20, 2026 23:07
@dagnir dagnir enabled auto-merge March 26, 2026 15:53
@dagnir dagnir added the no-api-surface-area-change Indicate there is no API surface area change and thus API surface area review is not required label Mar 26, 2026
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@dagnir dagnir added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 26, 2026
Merged via the queue into master with commit 7d1830b Mar 27, 2026
39 of 41 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request has been closed and the conversation has been locked. Comments on closed PRs are hard for our team to see. If you need more assistance, please open a new issue that references this one.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 27, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

no-api-surface-area-change Indicate there is no API surface area change and thus API surface area review is not required

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants