Skip to content

Cleartext storage of HMAC signing key in Amazon SageMaker Python SDK ModelBuilder/Serve path

High
jam-jee published GHSA-7hh5-prp2-mfh5 May 14, 2026

Package

pip sagemaker-python-sdk (pip)

Affected versions

>= v2.199.0 AND <= v2.257.1, >= v3.0.0 AND <= v3.7.1

Patched versions

v2.257.2 and v3.8.0

Description

Summary

Amazon SageMaker Python SDK is an open-source library for training and deploying machine learning models on Amazon SageMaker. An issue exists where, under certain circumstances, the ModelBuilder/Serve component stores an HMAC signing key in cleartext as a container environment variable, which is returned in plaintext by SageMaker describe APIs.

Impact

When using ModelBuilder to build and deploy models with affected model servers (TorchServe, Multi-Model Server, TensorFlow Serving, SMD, or Triton), the SDK generates an HMAC secret key for model artifact integrity verification and stores it as the SAGEMAKER_SERVE_SECRET_KEY environment variable in the SageMaker model container configuration. This environment variable is returned in plaintext by the DescribeModel, DescribeEndpointConfig, and DescribeModelPackage APIs. A remote authenticated actor with permissions to call these describe APIs and S3 write access to the model artifact path could extract the key, forge valid integrity signatures for specially crafted model artifacts, and achieve code execution in inference containers with the SageMaker execution role's IAM permissions.

Impacted versions: >= v2.199.0 AND <= v2.257.1, >= v3.0.0 AND <= v3.7.1

Patches

This issue has been addressed in Amazon SageMaker Python SDK v2.257.2 and v3.8.0. We recommend upgrading to the latest version and rebuilding any models previously created with ModelBuilder using the updated SDK. Models created with affected versions may still have the HMAC key stored in their container environment variables until they are rebuilt with the patched SDK. Ensure any forked or derivative code is patched to incorporate the new fixes.

Workarounds

If upgrading is not immediately possible, users can manually remove the SAGEMAKER_SERVE_SECRET_KEY environment variable from existing SageMaker models by recreating the model without this variable in the container environment configuration.

References

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, we ask that you contact AWS Security via our vulnerability reporting page or directly via email to aws-security@amazon.com. Please do not create a public GitHub issue.

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required High
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality High
Integrity None
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality High
Integrity High
Availability High

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

CVE ID

CVE-2026-8596

Weaknesses

Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information

The product stores sensitive information in cleartext within a resource that might be accessible to another control sphere. Learn more on MITRE.