feat(ci): Add doxygen to code quality workflow

[0utd4ted]

Depends-on: bao-project/bao-ci#92 #307

[0utd4ted]

My signature has been nulled. I will force it up again, if it's not an issue. Since it's only 1 commit, can we just rebase at merge?

[danielRep]

My signature has been nulled. I will force it up again, if it's not an issue. Since it's only 1 commit, can we just rebase at merge?

My bad. Yeah go ahead @AAGandomi

[danielRep]

FYI, bao-project/bao-ci#92 is merged. We are just missing #307.

[josecm]

The check we are introducing is failing itself. I think we may have to directly specify the doxyfile in the command.

Also, should we introduce this check as part of @bao-project/ci, and then call the ci make rule from this action?

[0utd4ted]

@josecm

The check we are introducing is failing itself. I think we may have to directly specify the doxyfile in the command.

Also, should we introduce this check as part of @bao-project/ci, and then call the ci make rule from this action?

This PR introduced Doxygen in the CI: bao-project/bao-ci#92 .
The Doxyfile, even if specified in the command, is missing (that is the reason why it's currently failing).
Doxygen will look automatically in the doxyfile in the root directory, so I don't think it's necessary to specify it in the CI command line.
A Doxyfile is being introduced as part of #307 (this PR has it as a dependency).

Edit: clarity.

[josecm]

@0utd4ted Sorry for the confusion! I haven't had time to look through these PRs for quite a while, so this wasn't fresh in my mind. I'll go through #307 over the next couple of weeks so we can get these moving.