Skip to content

Support arbitrary preprocessor #48

@jacky8hyf

Description

@jacky8hyf

Right now, we rely on ACTION_NAMES.preprocess_assemble for the preprocessor. We should support arbitrary preprocessor because preprocess_assemble is not perfect; it might be resolved to DUMMY_GCC_TOOL if there is no action config for it.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions