|
| 1 | +{ |
| 2 | + "status": "researched", |
| 3 | + "agent_type": "general-research-agent", |
| 4 | + "delegation_path": ["orchestrator", "research", "general-research-agent"], |
| 5 | + "task_number": 197, |
| 6 | + "session_id": "sess_1781531573_4cdbb4", |
| 7 | + "summary": "Upstream PR landscape audit for Modal/ logic. Key finding: no competing OPEN PRs for the modal signature refactoring. PR #607 (fmontesi) is OPEN but CHANGES_REQUESTED/stalled since 2026-05-29 — it proposes typeclass wrappers over the existing {not,and,diamond} primitives rather than refactoring them. The HasBox class name is identical in both approaches; the only conflict is HasImpl (PR #607) vs HasImp (our PRs). PRs #648 and #649 (our propositional and temporal PRs) are OPEN with no reviews yet. Recommended strategy: stack Modal PR on feat/temporal-formula-propositional branch, address HasImpl conflict proactively in PR description, coordinate with fmontesi via Zulip.", |
| 8 | + "artifacts": [ |
| 9 | + { |
| 10 | + "path": "specs/197_modal_upstream_initial_pr/reports/06_modal-pr-landscape.md", |
| 11 | + "type": "research", |
| 12 | + "summary": "Complete audit of upstream cslib PRs related to Modal/ logic: PR #528 and #535 (MERGED, original modal additions by fmontesi), PR #607 (OPEN CHANGES_REQUESTED, typeclass wrappers keeping existing primitives), PRs #648 and #649 (our OPEN PRs with no reviews). No competing signature-change PRs exist. Recommends stacking Modal PR on feat/temporal-formula-propositional, addressing HasImpl vs HasImp conflict in description, and Zulip coordination with fmontesi." |
| 13 | + } |
| 14 | + ], |
| 15 | + "findings_count": 7, |
| 16 | + "next_steps": "Run /implement 197 to submit the Modal PR following the plan in plans/05_modal-upstream-pr-plan.md", |
| 17 | + "memory_candidates": [ |
| 18 | + { |
| 19 | + "content": "CSLib upstream PR #607 (fmontesi/connectives, OPEN as of 2026-06-15): proposes 8 separate operator typeclass files under Foundations/Logic/Operators/ with class names HasAnd, HasBox, HasDiamond, HasIff, HasImpl, HasNot, HasOr, HasTensor. CHANGES_REQUESTED by chenson2018 (direction of simp/grind lemmas, suggestion to consolidate into one file). The class HasBox (field: box) is naming-compatible with our HasBox. The conflict is HasImpl (PR #607) vs HasImp (our PRs). PR #607 keeps existing {not, and, diamond} Modal primitives and adds typeclass wrappers.", |
| 20 | + "category": "INSIGHT", |
| 21 | + "source_artifact": "specs/197_modal_upstream_initial_pr/reports/06_modal-pr-landscape.md", |
| 22 | + "confidence": 0.9, |
| 23 | + "suggested_keywords": ["cslib", "upstream", "PR607", "HasImpl", "HasBox", "connectives", "typeclass"] |
| 24 | + }, |
| 25 | + { |
| 26 | + "content": "CSLib upstream stacking pattern for our PRs #648 and #649: PR #649 (feat/temporal-formula-propositional) bases off main but carries all of PR #648's (feat/propositional-v2) Connectives.lean changes plus temporal additions. The GitHub baseRefName shows 'main' for both, but #649 is effectively stacked on #648 by carrying its commits. Neither PR has received reviews as of 2026-06-15. The Modal PR should branch from feat/temporal-formula-propositional.", |
| 27 | + "category": "PATTERN", |
| 28 | + "source_artifact": "specs/197_modal_upstream_initial_pr/reports/06_modal-pr-landscape.md", |
| 29 | + "confidence": 0.85, |
| 30 | + "suggested_keywords": ["cslib", "stacking", "PR648", "PR649", "propositional", "temporal", "Connectives"] |
| 31 | + } |
| 32 | + ] |
| 33 | +} |
0 commit comments