metadata compatibility question

[danv61]

Hi @jonrkarr , is the metadata inside the attached omex file compatible with your reader?
It's a small proof of concept file, just to catch early any issue.
I tested it and it passes the validation test at the W3C rdf validator.
Note that this panel doesn't accept omex archives, so I had to change the extension to zip
Thanks!
biomodel_100596964.zip

[jonrkarr]

A few things need to be changed:

• The title should use http://dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/title rather than http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title.
  • Replace

    <dc:title rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">Regulation of quantal currents determines synaptic strength at neuromuscular synapses in larval Drosophila</dc:title>

    with

    <dcterms:title rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">Regulation of quantal currents determines synaptic strength at neuromuscular synapses in larval Drosophila</dc:title>

  • Replace http://purl.org/dc/terms/ with http://dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/
• The objects of http://example.org/contributor0, http://example.org/contributor1, etc. should be instances of rdf:Description.
  • E.g., replace

    <dc:contributor rdf:about="http://example.org/contributor0">
        <rdfs:label rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">Dan Vasilescu</rdfs:label>
        <foaf:name rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">Dan Vasilescu</foaf:name>
    </dc:contributor>

    with

    <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/contributor0">
        <rdfs:label rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">Dan Vasilescu</rdfs:label>
        <foaf:name rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">Dan Vasilescu</foaf:name>
    </rdf:Description>

• The unused namespaces (e.g., collex, sbo, etc.) can be declared, but this isn't necessary
• I've often seed local resources (e.g., http://example.org/contributor0) assigned URIs that are more clearly local such as local:0. This clarifies that they aren't expected to be globally meaningful.

[jonrkarr]

The validation can be checked at https://run.biosimulations.org/utils/validate-project