Skip to content

Replace Dastardly with Lightfuzz#2434

Merged
TheTechromancer merged 2 commits intodevfrom
delete-dastardly
May 1, 2025
Merged

Replace Dastardly with Lightfuzz#2434
TheTechromancer merged 2 commits intodevfrom
delete-dastardly

Conversation

@TheTechromancer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@TheTechromancer TheTechromancer commented Apr 29, 2025

With Lightfuzz, BBOT is now detecting low-hanging vulns in the following categories:

  • XSS
  • SQLI
  • NoSQLI
  • Crypto
  • SSTI
  • Path manipulation
  • Serialized objects

@domwhewell-sage we appreciate your work on the dastardly module. When you get a chance, would you care to test out the new lightfuzz functionality? It may justify removing dastardly. If not, that's fine; we can leave it in.

FYSA @Sh4d0wHunt3rX @liquidsec

@TheTechromancer TheTechromancer changed the base branch from stable to dev April 29, 2025 19:19
@TheTechromancer TheTechromancer self-assigned this Apr 29, 2025
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 29, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 93%. Comparing base (0c78fef) to head (4ce9019).
Report is 15 commits behind head on dev.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
bbot/test/test_step_2/module_tests/base.py 0% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##             dev   #2434   +/-   ##
=====================================
- Coverage     93%     93%   -0%     
=====================================
  Files        399     397    -2     
  Lines      32991   32897   -94     
=====================================
- Hits       30526   30431   -95     
- Misses      2465    2466    +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@domwhewell-sage
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hey, I'm in favor of depreciating Dastardly it seems great on the surface but it only identifies 7 vulnerabilities and is limited to 10 minutes

I ran lightfuzz-superheavy and spider-intense, It finished quicker than dastardly and found the insecure deserialization and SQLi that dastardly cannot

@TheTechromancer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

I ran lightfuzz-superheavy and spider-intense, It finished quicker than dastardly and found the insecure deserialization and SQLi that dastardly cannot

Sounds good. Thanks for testing!

@liquidsec
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I had no idea Dastardly was that limited. Interestingly enough, 2 of the "Dastardly can't find it" Red X's that lightfuzz also cant find are the current tool im working on (which will be a bbot module too) and the one i'm planning next :D

@TheTechromancer TheTechromancer merged commit 2d7a465 into dev May 1, 2025
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants