Replace Dastardly with Lightfuzz#2434
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #2434 +/- ##
=====================================
- Coverage 93% 93% -0%
=====================================
Files 399 397 -2
Lines 32991 32897 -94
=====================================
- Hits 30526 30431 -95
- Misses 2465 2466 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Hey, I'm in favor of depreciating Dastardly it seems great on the surface but it only identifies 7 vulnerabilities and is limited to 10 minutes I ran |
Sounds good. Thanks for testing! |
|
I had no idea Dastardly was that limited. Interestingly enough, 2 of the "Dastardly can't find it" Red X's that lightfuzz also cant find are the current tool im working on (which will be a bbot module too) and the one i'm planning next :D |
With Lightfuzz, BBOT is now detecting low-hanging vulns in the following categories:
@domwhewell-sage we appreciate your work on the dastardly module. When you get a chance, would you care to test out the new lightfuzz functionality? It may justify removing dastardly. If not, that's fine; we can leave it in.
FYSA @Sh4d0wHunt3rX @liquidsec