You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: README.md
+4-4Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
7
7
8
8
Python implementation of [GCF](https://gcformat.com/) — the most token-efficient wire format for LLMs. A drop-in alternative to JSON and TOON for any structured data.
9
9
10
-
**100% comprehension on every frontier model tested. 25.5% fewer tokens than TOON, 53% fewer than JSON across 15 datasets. 91.2% on structurally complex code graphs (vs TOON 68.2%, JSON 53.4%). 1,700+ LLM evaluations. Zero training.**
10
+
**100% comprehension on every frontier model tested. 29% fewer tokens than TOON, 56% fewer than JSON across 16 datasets. 91.2% on structurally complex code graphs (vs TOON 68.2%, JSON 53.4%). 2,400+ LLM evaluations. Zero training.**
11
11
12
12
Docs: [gcformat.com](https://gcformat.com/) · [Playground](https://gcformat.com/playground.html) · [GCF vs TOON](https://gcformat.com/guide/vs-toon.html)
13
13
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ Works on dicts, lists, and primitives. Lists of uniform dicts get tabular rows.
181
181
182
182
## Benchmarks
183
183
184
-
1,700+ LLM evaluations across 10 models, 3 providers, and 51 independent test runs.
184
+
2,400+ LLM evaluations across 10 models, 3 providers, and 51 independent test runs.
185
185
186
186
|| GCF | TOON | JSON |
187
187
|---|---|---|---|
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ Works on dicts, lists, and primitives. Lists of uniform dicts get tabular rows.
GCF wins 13/15 datasets on the expanded [token efficiency benchmark](https://github.com/blackwell-systems/toon/tree/gcf-comparison). Full results: [gcformat.com/guide/benchmarks](https://gcformat.com/guide/benchmarks.html)
193
+
GCF wins 15/16 datasets on the expanded [token efficiency benchmark](https://github.com/blackwell-systems/toon/tree/gcf-comparison). Full results: [gcformat.com/guide/benchmarks](https://gcformat.com/guide/benchmarks.html)
194
194
195
195
## Implementations
196
196
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ GCF wins 13/15 datasets on the expanded [token efficiency benchmark](https://git
211
211
212
212
**Zero runtime dependencies. Permanently.** All six implementations depend only on their language's standard library. No transitive dependencies. No supply chain risk. This is a permanent commitment: GCF will never take on external runtime dependencies. MIT licensed. All implementations support both generic profile (`encodeGeneric`) and graph profile (`encode`). CLI included in all 6 languages.
213
213
214
-
**Specification:**[SPEC v3.1 Stable](https://github.com/blackwell-systems/gcf/blob/main/SPEC.md) with 157 conformance fixtures, 33,000,000,000+ lossless round-trips verified across 5 formats and 6 languages. All implementations at v2.1.0+ (Go v1.2.0). Cross-language 6x6 matrix verified.
214
+
**Specification:**[SPEC v3.2 Stable](https://github.com/blackwell-systems/gcf/blob/main/SPEC.md) with 173 conformance fixtures, 43,000,000,000+ lossless round-trips verified across 5 formats and 6 languages. All implementations at v2.2.0+ (Go v1.3.0). Cross-language 6x6 matrix verified.
0 commit comments