docs(cs): groom analysis-phase.md translation

[JakubStejskalCZ]

Summary

• Improves the Czech translation of docs/cs/explanation/analysis-phase.md to better match the English source.
• Refines wording, phrasing, and terminology for more natural Czech while keeping Czech typographic quotes („…") and em dashes.
• Fixes a minor table header separator width.

Test plan

• Render the docs site locally (npm run docs:dev) and visually inspect /cs/explanation/analysis-phase/.
• Verify the page structure matches the English version (/explanation/analysis-phase/).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: This PR refines the Czech translation of docs/cs/explanation/analysis-phase.md to better mirror the English source while improving readability.

Changes:

• Rewords the intro and “why analysis” rationale for clearer cause/effect framing.
• Polishes descriptions of Brainstorming, Research, Product Brief, and PRFAQ (Working Backwards).
• Updates tool-usage guidance and several section headers for more natural Czech phrasing.
• Adjusts the tool-selection table (including header separator width) for cleaner rendering.

Notes: Content-only documentation changes; no runtime/behavioral code impact.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. 3 suggestions posted.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 76a1b069-75d4-4553-80df-d16c8cb52ffa

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 78b9aea and 4c5e275.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/cs/explanation/analysis-phase.md

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• docs/cs/explanation/analysis-phase.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The Czech documentation file docs/cs/explanation/analysis-phase.md was reworded for terminology consistency and clarity. Multiple sections (intro, "why analysis", tool subsections, comparison table, and closing section) had phrasing and header updates; no structural or functional changes were made.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Czech Documentation Updates docs/cs/explanation/analysis-phase.md	Comprehensive textual refinements: rephrased intro and "why analysis" content, updated tool subsections (Brainstorming, Výzkum, Product Brief, PRFAQ) wording and cross-links, rewrote comparison table rows and post-table paragraph, and renamed/rewrote closing section. No structural changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• docs(cs): add missing analysis-phase.md translation #2240: Previously added the same Czech documentation file; directly related as this PR refines that content.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely describes the main change: grooming/improving the Czech translation of the analysis-phase.md documentation file.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description is directly related to the changeset, explaining the translation improvements, wording refinements, and test plan for verifying the changes.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@docs/cs/explanation/analysis-phase.md`:
- Line 20: The term "UI" is incorrect here and should be replaced with "AI" or
"Umělá inteligence" for semantic accuracy; update the phrase "UI funguje jako
kouč" to "AI funguje jako kouč" (or "Umělá inteligence funguje jako kouč") and
make the same substitution for the identical occurrence referenced at lines 38,
ensuring consistency with the usage on line 46.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: ad727afd-4c99-42c2-ac89-789d7d7eed9c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between daa7137 and 78b9aea.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/cs/explanation/analysis-phase.md

[github-actions]

@coderabbitai review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

[augmentcode]

Review completed. 4 suggestions posted.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.