Replies: 2 comments
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
The KernelPatch was originally designed to not require APatch, and it still does
获取Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
…________________________________
From: Axel Karjalainen ***@***.***>
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 6:22:59 AM
To: bmax121/APatch ***@***.***>
Cc: bmax121 ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [bmax121/APatch] Superkey vs package name/UID check (Discussion #644)
@bmax121<https://github.com/bmax121>
―
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#644 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC5624Z4LENVYSS6YZNCIFD2YGSMHAVCNFSM6AAAAABNN5BHPWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTENZUGM4TAOI>.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Why is there a "superkey"? Why not a Magisk manager-like thing where APatch checks the package name/UID?
Wouldn't it be way more secure to let the user just toggle apps access to root? Maybe the UIDs could be fetched by the manager and saved to a special file, which the kernel module would read.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions