Merge pull request #267 from krystian-wojtas/fix-typos

typos

Author: bombela

backward.hpp

@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
 // #define BACKWARD_HAS_UNWIND 1
 //  - unwind comes from libgcc, but I saw an equivalent inside clang itself.
 //  - with unwind, the stacktrace is as accurate as it can possibly be, since
-//  this is used by the C++ runtine in gcc/clang for stack unwinding on
+//  this is used by the C++ runtime in gcc/clang for stack unwinding on
 //  exception.
 //  - normally libgcc is already linked to your program by default.
 //
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@
 // #define BACKWARD_HAS_UNWIND 1
 //  - unwind comes from libgcc, but I saw an equivalent inside clang itself.
 //  - with unwind, the stacktrace is as accurate as it can possibly be, since
-//  this is used by the C++ runtine in gcc/clang for stack unwinding on
+//  this is used by the C++ runtime in gcc/clang for stack unwinding on
 //  exception.
 //  - normally libgcc is already linked to your program by default.
 //
@@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ template <typename F> class Unwinder {
     uintptr_t ip = _Unwind_GetIPInfo(ctx, &ip_before_instruction);
 
     if (!ip_before_instruction) {
-      // calculating 0-1 for unsigned, looks like a possible bug to sanitiziers,
+      // calculating 0-1 for unsigned, looks like a possible bug to sanitizers,
       // so let's do it explicitly:
       if (ip == 0) {
         ip = std::numeric_limits<uintptr_t>::max(); // set it to 0xffff... (as
@@ -1460,7 +1460,7 @@ class TraceResolverLinuxImpl<trace_resolver_tag::libbfd>
     // line of the function that was called. But if the code is optimized,
     // we might get something absolutely not related since the compiler
     // can reschedule the return address with inline functions and
-    // tail-call optimisation (among other things that I don't even know
+    // tail-call optimization (among other things that I don't even know
     // or cannot even dream about with my tiny limited brain).
     find_sym_result details_adjusted_call_site = find_symbol_details(
         fobj, (void *)(uintptr_t(trace.addr) - 1), symbol_info.dli_fbase);
@@ -1491,7 +1491,7 @@ class TraceResolverLinuxImpl<trace_resolver_tag::libbfd>
         // this time we get the name of the function where the code is
         // located, instead of the function were the address is
         // located. In short, if the code was inlined, we get the
-        // function correspoding to the code. Else we already got in
+        // function corresponding to the code. Else we already got in
         // trace.function.
         trace.source.function = demangle(details_selected->funcname);
 
@@ -1706,7 +1706,7 @@ class TraceResolverLinuxImpl<trace_resolver_tag::libbfd>
 
     // are we in the boundaries of the section?
     if (addr < sec_addr || addr >= sec_addr + size) {
-      addr -= base_addr; // oups, a relocated object, lets try again...
+      addr -= base_addr; // oops, a relocated object, lets try again...
       if (addr < sec_addr || addr >= sec_addr + size) {
         return;
       }
@@ -4372,7 +4372,7 @@ class SignalHandling {
   static const constexpr int signal_skip_recs =
 #ifdef __clang__
       // With clang, RtlCaptureContext also captures the stack frame of the
-      // current function Below that, there ar 3 internal Windows functions
+      // current function Below that, there are 3 internal Windows functions
       4
 #else
       // With MSVC cl, RtlCaptureContext misses the stack frame of the current