[opencode] Create product launch readiness documentation

[heodongun]

Summary

• Auto-published by the Cotor desktop app after task completion.
• Task: Create product launch readiness documentation
• Agent: opencode
• Branch: codex/cotor/create-product-launch-readiness-documentation-1dbed3cc/opencode
• Base: main

Prompt

Task
- Deliver this issue with a real repository change: Create product launch readiness documentation
- Scope: Write docs/product/launch-readiness.md with scope, risks, and acceptance checklist for the launch.
- Work as a direct implementer. Start editing immediately and do not plan, delegate, or do broad repo exploration.
- Only read or write files reachable from the current working directory. Never write to absolute paths, parent directories, or unrelated repository checkouts.
- Do not create placeholder diffs, marker comments, README-only edits, or validation-only artifacts.
- Keep the result coherent and shippable when opened directly by a user.
- graphify=Use graphify for repository structure, dependencies, and cross-module questions. Prefer `graphify query`, `graphify explain`, or `graphify path` from the company root before broad manual search; the workspace map reads local graph data when present.
- Run one targeted validation command after the change, report the result, and stop.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added comprehensive launch readiness documentation for the Gemma Agent Runtime smoke test feature, outlining scope (environment verification, functional validation), potential risks (configuration inconsistencies, dependencies, integration challenges), and acceptance criteria.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new launch readiness checklist document is added for the Cotoro Gemma Agent Runtime smoke test feature, defining scope, risk factors, and acceptance criteria for product launch validation.

Changes

Launch Readiness Documentation

Layer / File(s)

Summary

Product Launch Checklist docs/product/launch-readiness.md

Introduces launch readiness document with scope (environment verification, agent functionality, smoke test execution, sandbox configuration), identified risks (configuration inconsistencies, dependency conflicts, limited test coverage, sandbox performance, integration challenges), and acceptance criteria (initialization, functional verification, test completion, documentation, error-free execution).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

A checklist emerges from the warren's design,
Smoke tests and readiness, all in a line,
With scopes and with risks both numbered with care,
This fluffy framework shows launch is quite fair! 🐰✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly describes the main change: creating product launch readiness documentation. It directly corresponds to the file addition (docs/product/launch-readiness.md) and the PR's primary objective.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch codex/cotor/create-product-launch-readiness-documentation-1dbed3cc/opencode

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

Git: Failed to clone repository. Please run the @coderabbitai full review command to re-trigger a full review. If the issue persists, set path_filters to include or exclude specific files.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@docs/product/launch-readiness.md`:
- Line 4: The document uses two product names ("Cotoro" and "Cotor"); update all
occurrences of the shorter form to the canonical "Cotoro" so naming is
consistent (search and replace every "Cotor" instance to "Cotoro"), including
the title, headings and body text referenced around the current lines and the
other noted sections; after replacing, scan the whole file for any remaining
variants (case-sensitive and capitalized) and ensure all launch artifacts and
labels use "Cotoro" uniformly.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: cce480a2-4707-4948-bc8b-d44e7c0ee666

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 72f42b2 and 350ec35.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/product/launch-readiness.md

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win

Unify product naming to avoid ambiguity.

The document alternates between Cotoro and Cotor naming. Please standardize to the canonical product name across all sections so launch artifacts are unambiguous.

Also applies to: 8-8, 16-16

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@docs/product/launch-readiness.md` at line 4, The document uses two product
names ("Cotoro" and "Cotor"); update all occurrences of the shorter form to the
canonical "Cotoro" so naming is consistent (search and replace every "Cotor"
instance to "Cotoro"), including the title, headings and body text referenced
around the current lines and the other noted sections; after replacing, scan the
whole file for any remaining variants (case-sensitive and capitalized) and
ensure all launch artifacts and labels use "Cotoro" uniformly.

[heodongun]

QA_VERDICT: CHANGES_REQUESTED

QA summary from Cotor:

• The launch readiness documentation has been created with all required sections (scope, risks, acceptance checklist). However, there's a naming inconsistency: the document uses both "Cotoro" and "Cotor". Please standardize to the canonical product name "Cotoro" throughout the document (specifically lines 11 and 15).
• Once this minor fix is applied, the work will be ready for CEO approval. No other residual risks are identified.

[heodongun]

QA_VERDICT: PASS

QA summary from Cotor:

• The product launch readiness documentation has been successfully created with all required sections (scope, risks, acceptance checklist). The content is clear, comprehensive, and meets the acceptance criteria. No defects or missing elements were identified during review. The work is ready for CEO approval. Residual ris…