@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ TEST(ValidatorTest, ValidateBool) {
8080 ASSERT_TRUE (violations_or.ok ()) << violations_or.status ();
8181 ASSERT_EQ (violations_or.value ().violations_size (), 1 );
8282 EXPECT_EQ (violations_or.value ().violations (0 ).proto ().rule_id (), " bool.const" );
83- EXPECT_EQ (violations_or.value ().violations (0 ).proto ().message (), " value must equal false" );
83+ EXPECT_EQ (violations_or.value ().violations (0 ).proto ().message (), " must equal false" );
8484}
8585
8686TEST (ValidatorTest, ValidateStrRepeatedUniqueSuccess) {
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ TEST(ValidatorTest, ValidateRelativeURIFailure) {
141141 ASSERT_TRUE (violations_or.ok ()) << violations_or.status ();
142142 EXPECT_EQ (violations_or.value ().violations_size (), 1 );
143143 EXPECT_EQ (violations_or.value ().violations (0 ).proto ().rule_id (), " string.uri" );
144- EXPECT_EQ (violations_or.value ().violations (0 ).proto ().message (), " value must be a valid URI" );
144+ EXPECT_EQ (violations_or.value ().violations (0 ).proto ().message (), " must be a valid URI" );
145145 EXPECT_THAT (
146146 violations_or.value ().violations (0 ).field_value (),
147147 Optional (FieldValueOf (VariantWith<std::string>(" /foo/bar?baz=quux" ))));
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ TEST(ValidatorTest, ValidateBadURIRefFailure) {
202202 EXPECT_EQ (violations_or.value ().violations_size (), 1 );
203203 EXPECT_EQ (violations_or.value ().violations (0 ).proto ().rule_id (), " string.uri_ref" );
204204 EXPECT_EQ (
205- violations_or.value ().violations (0 ).proto ().message (), " value must be a valid URI Reference" );
205+ violations_or.value ().violations (0 ).proto ().message (), " must be a valid URI Reference" );
206206 EXPECT_THAT (
207207 violations_or.value ().violations (0 ).field_value (),
208208 Optional (FieldValueOf (VariantWith<std::string>(" !@#$%^&*" ))));
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ TEST(ValidatorTest, ValidateStringContainsFailure) {
251251 EXPECT_EQ (violations_or.value ().violations (0 ).proto ().rule_id (), " string.contains" );
252252 EXPECT_EQ (
253253 violations_or.value ().violations (0 ).proto ().message (),
254- " value does not contain substring `bar`" );
254+ " does not contain substring `bar`" );
255255}
256256
257257TEST (ValidatorTest, ValidateStringContainsSuccess) {
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ TEST(ValidatorTest, ValidateBytesContainsFailure) {
279279 ASSERT_TRUE (violations_or.ok ()) << violations_or.status ();
280280 EXPECT_EQ (violations_or.value ().violations_size (), 1 );
281281 EXPECT_EQ (violations_or.value ().violations (0 ).proto ().rule_id (), " bytes.contains" );
282- EXPECT_EQ (violations_or.value ().violations (0 ).proto ().message (), " value does not contain 626172" );
282+ EXPECT_EQ (violations_or.value ().violations (0 ).proto ().message (), " does not contain 626172" );
283283}
284284
285285TEST (ValidatorTest, ValidateBytesContainsSuccess) {
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ TEST(ValidatorTest, ValidateStartsWithFailure) {
308308 EXPECT_EQ (violations_or.value ().violations_size (), 1 );
309309 EXPECT_EQ (violations_or.value ().violations (0 ).proto ().rule_id (), " string.prefix" );
310310 EXPECT_EQ (
311- violations_or.value ().violations (0 ).proto ().message (), " value does not have prefix `foo`" );
311+ violations_or.value ().violations (0 ).proto ().message (), " does not have prefix `foo`" );
312312}
313313
314314TEST (ValidatorTest, ValidateStartsWithSuccess) {
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ TEST(ValidatorTest, ValidateEndsWithFailure) {
337337 EXPECT_EQ (violations_or.value ().violations_size (), 1 );
338338 EXPECT_EQ (violations_or.value ().violations (0 ).proto ().rule_id (), " string.suffix" );
339339 EXPECT_EQ (
340- violations_or.value ().violations (0 ).proto ().message (), " value does not have suffix `baz`" );
340+ violations_or.value ().violations (0 ).proto ().message (), " does not have suffix `baz`" );
341341}
342342
343343TEST (ValidatorTest, ValidateHostnameSuccess) {
0 commit comments