Skip to content

Commit 49a4c99

Browse files
author
bretislav.wajtr
committed
#7 Tried to implement version for sql2o, but it does not support spring transactions -> just mentioned that in README
1 parent f53cafc commit 49a4c99

1 file changed

Lines changed: 2 additions & 1 deletion

File tree

README.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@ With that conditions in respect, following frameworks were compared:
2828
I tried to find optimal (== most readable) implementation in every framework, but comments are welcomed! There are lot of comments in the code explaining why I chose such implementation and some FIXMEs on places which I do not like, but which cannot be implemented differently or which I have troubles to improve...
2929

3030
Furthermore, I considered (and tried to implement) even following frameworks, but it turned out they do not meet the conditions:
31-
* [Speedment](https://github.com/speedment/speedment) - hides SQL language too much and tries to replace with stream operations; not all scenarios can be implemented in it; as of 11/30/2016 and version 3.0.1 the documentation on GitHub is very weak
31+
* [Speedment](https://github.com/speedment/speedment) - hides SQL language too much and tries to replace with stream operations; not all scenarios can be implemented in it; as of 11/30/2016 and version 3.0.1 the documentation on GitHub is very weak
32+
* [sql2o](http://www.sql2o.org/) - it does not support Spring transaction management at all (tested version 1.6.0-RC3), that's a show stopper - tracking this in [Issue #7](https://github.com/bwajtr/java-persistence-frameworks-comparison/issues/7)
3233

3334
## Scenarios implemented
3435

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)