fix missing params

Author: bernhardoj

tests/unit/SubscriptionUtilsTest.ts

@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ describe('SubscriptionUtils', () => {
         });
 
         it("should return false if the user isn't a workspace's owner or isn't a member of any past due billing workspace", () => {
-            expect(shouldRestrictUserBillableActions('1', undefined)).toBeFalsy();
+            expect(shouldRestrictUserBillableActions('1', undefined, undefined)).toBeFalsy();
         });
 
         it('should return false if the user is a non-owner of a workspace that is not in the shared NVP collection', async () => {
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ describe('SubscriptionUtils', () => {
                 },
             });
 
-            expect(shouldRestrictUserBillableActions(policyID, getUnixTime(addDays(new Date(), 3)))).toBeFalsy();
+            expect(shouldRestrictUserBillableActions(policyID, getUnixTime(addDays(new Date(), 3)), undefined)).toBeFalsy();
         });
 
         it("should return false if the user is the workspace's owner that is past due billing but isn't owning any amount", async () => {
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ describe('SubscriptionUtils', () => {
                 },
             });
 
-            expect(shouldRestrictUserBillableActions(policyID, getUnixTime(subDays(new Date(), 3)))).toBeFalsy();
+            expect(shouldRestrictUserBillableActions(policyID, getUnixTime(subDays(new Date(), 3)), undefined)).toBeFalsy();
         });
 
         it("should return true if the user is the workspace's owner that is past due billing and is owning some amount", async () => {
@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ describe('SubscriptionUtils', () => {
                 },
             });
 
-            expect(shouldRestrictUserBillableActions(policyID, getUnixTime(subDays(new Date(), 3)))).toBeTruthy();
+            expect(shouldRestrictUserBillableActions(policyID, getUnixTime(subDays(new Date(), 3)), undefined)).toBeTruthy();
         });
 
         it("should return false if the user is past due billing but is not the workspace's owner", async () => {
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ describe('SubscriptionUtils', () => {
                 },
             });
 
-            expect(shouldRestrictUserBillableActions(policyID, getUnixTime(subDays(new Date(), 3)))).toBeFalsy();
+            expect(shouldRestrictUserBillableActions(policyID, getUnixTime(subDays(new Date(), 3)), undefined)).toBeFalsy();
         });
 
         it('should restrict when ownerBillingGraceEndPeriod is passed directly as 3rd param and is past due', async () => {
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ describe('SubscriptionUtils', () => {
                 },
             });
 
-            expect(shouldRestrictUserBillableActions(policyID, getUnixTime(subDays(new Date(), 3)))).toBeTruthy();
+            expect(shouldRestrictUserBillableActions(policyID, getUnixTime(subDays(new Date(), 3)), undefined)).toBeTruthy();
         });
 
         it("should return false if the user is past due billing but is not the workspace's owner", async () => {
@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ describe('SubscriptionUtils', () => {
                 },
             });
 
-            expect(shouldRestrictUserBillableActions(policyID, getUnixTime(subDays(new Date(), 3)))).toBeFalsy();
+            expect(shouldRestrictUserBillableActions(policyID, getUnixTime(subDays(new Date(), 3)), undefined)).toBeFalsy();
         });
 
         it('should restrict when ownerBillingGraceEndPeriod is passed directly as 4th param and is past due', async () => {
@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ describe('SubscriptionUtils', () => {
                 },
             });
 
-            expect(shouldRestrictUserBillableActions(policyID, getUnixTime(subDays(new Date(), 3)))).toBeTruthy();
+            expect(shouldRestrictUserBillableActions(policyID, getUnixTime(subDays(new Date(), 3)), undefined)).toBeTruthy();
         });
 
         it('should not restrict when ownerBillingGraceEndPeriod is passed directly as 4th param but is not past due', async () => {
@@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ describe('SubscriptionUtils', () => {
                 },
             });
 
-            expect(shouldRestrictUserBillableActions(policyID, getUnixTime(addDays(new Date(), 3)))).toBeFalsy();
+            expect(shouldRestrictUserBillableActions(policyID, getUnixTime(addDays(new Date(), 3)), undefined)).toBeFalsy();
         });
 
         it('should not restrict when ownerBillingGraceEndPeriod is passed directly as 4th param but amount owed is 0', async () => {
@@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ describe('SubscriptionUtils', () => {
                 },
             });
 
-            expect(shouldRestrictUserBillableActions(policyID, getUnixTime(subDays(new Date(), 3)))).toBeFalsy();
+            expect(shouldRestrictUserBillableActions(policyID, getUnixTime(subDays(new Date(), 3)), undefined)).toBeFalsy();
         });
 
         it('should restrict when amountOwed is passed directly and is greater than 0', async () => {
@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ describe('SubscriptionUtils', () => {
                 },
             });
 
-            expect(shouldRestrictUserBillableActions(policyID, getUnixTime(subDays(new Date(), 3)))).toBeFalsy();
+            expect(shouldRestrictUserBillableActions(policyID, getUnixTime(subDays(new Date(), 3)), undefined)).toBeFalsy();
         });
     });