@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ describe('ReportUtils', () => {
306306
307307 const policy1 = { ...createRandomPolicy ( Number ( policyID ) , CONST . POLICY . TYPE . TEAM ) , areInvoicesEnabled : true , role : CONST . POLICY . ROLE . ADMIN } ;
308308
309- // Given that there is atleast one outstanding expense report in a policy
309+ // Given that there is at least one outstanding expense report in a policy
310310 const outstandingExpenseReport = {
311311 ...createExpenseReport ( 483 ) ,
312312 policyID,
@@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ describe('ReportUtils', () => {
322322 actorAccountID : currentUserAccountID ,
323323 childStateNum : CONST . REPORT . STATE_NUM . OPEN ,
324324 childStatusNum : CONST . REPORT . STATUS_NUM . OPEN ,
325+ // eslint-disable-next-line deprecation/deprecation
325326 originalMessage : {
326327 ...randomReportAction . originalMessage ,
327328 IOUReportID,
@@ -352,8 +353,8 @@ describe('ReportUtils', () => {
352353 return waitForBatchedUpdates ( ) ;
353354 } ) ;
354355
355- // Then the user should be able to move the invoice to the oustanding expense report
356- it ( 'should return true for invoice report action given that there is a minimum of one oustanding report' , ( ) => {
356+ // Then the user should be able to move the invoice to the outstanding expense report
357+ it ( 'should return true for invoice report action given that there is a minimum of one outstanding report' , ( ) => {
357358 const canEditReportField = canEditFieldOfMoneyRequest ( reportAction , CONST . EDIT_REQUEST_FIELD . REPORT ) ;
358359 expect ( canEditReportField ) . toBe ( true ) ;
359360 } ) ;
0 commit comments