-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 360
eds: Fix signed integer limit parsing for all bit widths, log errors #658
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
acolomb
merged 14 commits into
canopen-python:master
from
friederschueler:fix/eds-limit-parsing
Jun 27, 2026
+167
−53
Merged
Changes from 8 commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bf972c1
eds: fix LowLimit/HighLimit parsing for all signed integer types
friederschueler f65a1fb
eds: revert LowLimit/HighLimit parse error to silent pass, remove war…
friederschueler 4ed45dd
add back and add more exception handling via warning instead of silen…
friederschueler 4319d4a
eds: use eds.get() in warning for DefaultValue/ParameterValue (mypy fix)
friederschueler 2382b96
eds: support decimal and hex literals for signed LowLimit/HighLimit
friederschueler 28c7d26
Consistent logic with early return / raise.
acolomb 3d1d2d4
eds: address review open points
friederschueler aa5257a
Merge branch 'master' into fix/eds-limit-parsing
friederschueler cb00c3b
test to cover added warning logs
acolomb 417ace5
missing import
acolomb 2b900a9
Test to cover _revert_variable() branches (without default_raw).
acolomb e6d1074
cosmetics, make black happier
acolomb f757937
renamed _convert_variable → _decode_from_eds and _revert_variable → _…
bizfsc c653378
Remove leftover type check in _encode_to_eds().
acolomb File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was really confused why this is necessary to avoid a test failure now. Here's my analysis:
DataType=0x40andLowLimit=0x3.build_variable()sees it's an unknown data type without a correspondingDefaultValuein a section40sub1.data_typeis forced to DOMAIN.var.minis correctly parsed from theLowLimitto anint(3).export_variablenow tries to pass theintto_revert_variable().bytes, so the string conversion viabytes.hex()fails with the integer argument.Why exactly do we need to call
_revert_variable()at all on the limit values? We didn't do that before.This function is terribly named by the way, I cannot even imagine whether it should be applied to the limits (which are always numeric). But as it mirrors
_convert_variable(), one should assume that it requiresbytesfor a DOMAIN variable unconditionally. Simply skipping to astr()conversion seems wrong.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This additional restriction is not needed when not passing limit values through the function (as it was before the PR). Pushed a commit reverting this hunk.