Skip to content

Remove the Adorn label grey peek and sit it flush below the card (CS-11331)#5120

Merged
lukemelia merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
cs-11331-tag-grey-peek-and-nudge
Jun 5, 2026
Merged

Remove the Adorn label grey peek and sit it flush below the card (CS-11331)#5120
lukemelia merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
cs-11331-tag-grey-peek-and-nudge

Conversation

@lukemelia

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Resolves CS-11331 (2 of 3 points). Split out of #5111.

  • Grey peek (fixed): the label tab cast a grey drop-shadow filter that bled past its clipped/rounded corners; removed it.
  • Below-card vertical alignment (fixed): the tab overlapped the card bottom by 2px, riding 1px too high; reduced to a 1px tuck under the bottom outline stroke.
  • Border-radius (not changed, deliberately): the tab is a separate 24px-tall flag; the card is 10px. Force-matching the radii would make the small tab look disproportionate, so the right treatment is a design call left for Burcu. CS-11331 stays open for it.

Base: main — independent of the item-button ring stack (#5117#5118#5119), so it can land on its own.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

lukemelia and others added 2 commits June 4, 2026 18:32
When the type-label tab flips below a card (no room above), it overlapped
the card's bottom edge by 2px, leaving it sitting one pixel too high over
the edge. Reduce the overlap to 1px so the flag's top edge still tucks under
the bottom outline stroke and reads as attached. Addresses the
vertical-alignment point of CS-11331; verified live (overlap 2px → 1px).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The Adorn label tab cast a grey `drop-shadow` filter that bled out past
its clipped/rounded corners as a grey peek. Remove it. Combined with the
1px below-card nudge, the tab reads as cleanly attached to the card.

Two of the three CS-11331 points are addressed here (grey peek and the
below-card vertical alignment). The border-radius point is left as a
deliberate design call — the tab is a separate 24px-tall flag and the
card is 10px, so force-matching the radii would make the small tab look
disproportionate — and CS-11331 stays open for it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Preview deployments

Host Test Results

    1 files  ±0      1 suites  ±0   1h 52m 12s ⏱️ + 14m 2s
2 936 tests ±0  2 921 ✅ ±0  15 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
2 955 runs  ±0  2 940 ✅ ±0  15 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 7893dec. ± Comparison against earlier commit 7d7b880.

Realm Server Test Results

    1 files  ±0      1 suites  ±0   11m 7s ⏱️ - 1m 57s
1 559 tests ±0  1 558 ✅ ±0  1 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
1 650 runs  ±0  1 649 ✅ ±0  1 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 7893dec. ± Comparison against earlier commit 7d7b880.

@lukemelia lukemelia requested review from a team and burieberry June 5, 2026 02:40
@lukemelia lukemelia marked this pull request as ready for review June 5, 2026 02:40
A 1px overlap into the card still read as the tag riding slightly too high.
Anchor the flipped-below label's top edge exactly at the card's bottom edge
(zero overlap) instead; its z-index keeps it above the selection outline
stroke, so it still reads as attached. Verified live (label top == card
bottom).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@lukemelia lukemelia changed the title Remove the Adorn label grey peek and nudge it 1px below the card (CS-11331) Remove the Adorn label grey peek and sit it flush below the card (CS-11331) Jun 5, 2026

@burieberry burieberry left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

border radii are fine with me as long as they're matching those of the design

@lukemelia lukemelia merged commit ff84e9d into main Jun 5, 2026
72 of 73 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants