-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
feat(hooks): add on_request_permission hook for external notifications
#246
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
ro0gr
wants to merge
2
commits into
carlos-algms:main
Choose a base branch
from
ro0gr:feat/execution-notifications
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+123
−2
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Use the request’s session ID in hook payload to avoid stale-session misreporting.
session_id = self.session_idcan be incorrect if an older permission event arrives after a session switch. Userequest.sessionIdfor payload accuracy.Proposed fix
P.invoke_hook("on_request_permission", { request = request, - session_id = self.session_id, + session_id = request.sessionId, tab_page_id = self.tab_page_id, })🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess if the session is stale, there is no point to notify? And maybe the whole callback should be ignored(or even not invoked at all)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ro0gr— You're right, and that's a better approach. Just swapping the session ID in the payload would still show diffs, render inline permission buttons, and stop the status animation for an event that belongs to a dead session. All of that should be skipped.The pattern the rest of this file uses (e.g., in
_handle_model_change,_handle_thought_level_change) is to capture the session ID at closure-creation time and bail out early if it no longer matches. For_build_handlersthat would look roughly like:The key nuance is that silently dropping
callback(not calling it at all) would leave the agent side waiting indefinitely for a response, so calling it with"reject_once"before returning ensures the protocol stays consistent. Would you like me to open a follow-up issue for this, or plan the full code change?🧠 Learnings used