Skip to content

Remove verify-helm-unittest side effect#581

Merged
cert-manager-prow[bot] merged 1 commit intocert-manager:mainfrom
erikgb:remove-helm-unit-side-effect
Apr 7, 2026
Merged

Remove verify-helm-unittest side effect#581
cert-manager-prow[bot] merged 1 commit intocert-manager:mainfrom
erikgb:remove-helm-unit-side-effect

Conversation

@erikgb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@erikgb erikgb commented Apr 7, 2026

#576 introduces a side-effect causing issues in some of our projects. Example: cert-manager/google-cas-issuer#471

I don't see why the side-effect is required to run the Helm unit tests.

@cert-manager-prow cert-manager-prow bot added the dco-signoff: yes Indicates that all commits in the pull request have the valid DCO sign-off message. label Apr 7, 2026
@erikgb erikgb requested a review from Copilot April 7, 2026 08:28
@cert-manager-prow cert-manager-prow bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 7, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Removes an unintended side effect from the verify-helm-unittest make target so running Helm unit tests does not mutate the chart’s Chart.yaml.

Changes:

  • Removed the yq in-place edit that was setting artifacthub.io/prerelease during verify-helm-unittest.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Signed-off-by: Erik Godding Boye <egboye@gmail.com>
@erikgb erikgb force-pushed the remove-helm-unit-side-effect branch from 8848b36 to 4238187 Compare April 7, 2026 08:33
@erikgb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

erikgb commented Apr 7, 2026

/cc @hjoshi123 @inteon

@cert-manager-prow cert-manager-prow bot requested review from hjoshi123 and inteon April 7, 2026 08:33
@inteon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

inteon commented Apr 7, 2026

/approve
/lgtm

@erikgb could you verify that none of our repos had this field set accidentally?

@cert-manager-prow cert-manager-prow bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 7, 2026
@cert-manager-prow
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: inteon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@cert-manager-prow cert-manager-prow bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 7, 2026
@cert-manager-prow cert-manager-prow bot merged commit 3cd5a15 into cert-manager:main Apr 7, 2026
5 checks passed
@erikgb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

erikgb commented Apr 7, 2026

@erikgb could you verify that none of our repos had this field set accidentally?

Sure!

@erikgb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

erikgb commented Apr 7, 2026

It seems like it didn't manage to change anything, ref. https://github.com/search?q=org%3Acert-manager+artifacthub.io%2Fprerelease+path%3A%2F%5Edeploy%5C%2Fcharts%5C%2F%2F&type=code

That would anyway be blocked by the failing make verify running in CI.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Indicates that all commits in the pull request have the valid DCO sign-off message. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants