Skip to content

[DO NOT MERGE] Build CheCode editor image to test PR-370#743

Draft
vrubezhny wants to merge 1 commit into
che-incubator:mainfrom
vrubezhny:TEST-PR-370
Draft

[DO NOT MERGE] Build CheCode editor image to test PR-370#743
vrubezhny wants to merge 1 commit into
che-incubator:mainfrom
vrubezhny:TEST-PR-370

Conversation

@vrubezhny

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Opened to create a CheCode editor image to test:

What does this PR do?

What issues does this PR fix?

How to test this PR?

Does this PR contain changes that override default upstream Code-OSS behavior?

  • the PR contains changes in the code folder (you can skip it if your changes are placed in a che extension )
  • the corresponding items were added to the CHANGELOG.md file
  • rules for automatic git rebase were added to the .rebase folder

Opened to create a CheCode editor image to test:

- eclipse-che/che-machine-exec#370

Signed-off-by: Victor Rubezhny <vrubezhny@redhat.com>
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Click here to review and test in web IDE: Contribute

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@vrubezhny, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 37 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: fb3e8982-7895-41b8-99a2-b91c299d939b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5a55387 and 538144b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • build/dockerfiles/assembly.Dockerfile
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@tolusha

tolusha commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi! I'm che-ai-assistant — I help with your pull requests.

Available commands:

  • /che-ai-assistant generate-che-doc — Generate a documentation PR based on this PR's changes
  • /che-ai-assistant ok-pr-review — Run a comprehensive PR review (summary, code review, deep review, impact analysis)
  • /che-ai-assistant check-pr-test-failures — Analyze failing CI checks, identify root causes, and suggest fixes
  • /che-ai-assistant help — Show this help message

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@RomanNikitenko RomanNikitenko marked this pull request as draft July 2, 2026 06:09
@sbouchet

sbouchet commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

something wrong with this :
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants